H2H3 / Teams & Draft Order

Ahh. I cede your point, indeed.

The clubbing inflicted by a seal clubbing club, likely by a seal clubber, who may or may not be in a club, would in fact be a powerful force.

What happened to MachChunk anyway? I'll replace him, lol.

Two questions.

1. Can an H2H map be bigger than 50x50, or does it always have to be that? What is the maximum size it can be, if any?

2. Is a park only created in the week that it is due, or can it be built beforehand and put on ice?

Im pretty sure we get provided the workbench. I just hope they will be good benches, like the PT one was

Wouldn't it be more logical to let the participants choose their own scenery for RCT2 H2H parks?

Two questions.

1. Can an H2H map be bigger than 50x50, or does it always have to be that? What is the maximum size it can be, if any?

2. Is a park only created in the week that it is due, or can it be built beforehand and put on ice?

I was wondering the same things.

What say you iris?

Kumba, you already know all rules and answers will be provided on June, 2.

ah shocks

Shocks. Haha.

What happened to MachChunk anyway? I'll replace him, lol.

I'm still here

and nobody forget it.

damn, I thought you left

ah shocks

Okay, how do you fuck that one up?

I'm still here

and nobody forget it.

Hahahaha

There should be crazy twists. Like, if you lose a match, your team has to vote someone out. The people voted out go to an outcasted team, and they play for ultimate payback!

Why, we could make a fortune off of marketing ideas such as this!

Aside from the fact that I just stole it from Survivor...

rctfreak2000 for Graduation!

I suggested vote-outs a long time ago. My idea.

Though, iris or some other H2H-important person probably had the idea before me. So it doesn't matter really.

That vote-out thing wouldn't be a bad idea. :scarface:

I don't like the voting out idea. It gives the newer parkmakers less of a chance to prove themselves and makes it all about winning. On top of that, part of the charm of the game is balancing when and where to use your top picks and your bottom picks. The whole LL vs RCT2 angle already gives it an interesting twist - no need to get gimmicky. If anything, I think something could be done to make the playoffs a little more interesting. After 10 weeks it all comes down to one match to decide the finalists. That's how it was before and while it does make for interesting strategy, it still means 2 parkmakers out of 10 are responsible for the success or failure of the team in the post-season. Maybe some kind of round-robin system would work where the playoff teams all play matches and then the teams with the best records in those matches move on. Single elimination does have a certain do or die charm to it though, I only wish there was a way to involve more people on each team in the deciding matches.

^like the best two out of three system used last year for the Finals?

Oh, and I've always thought it would be cool that the losing team in the simis became part of the team that beat them. It would make for some really, really interesting final matches.

ride6

I don't like the voting out idea. It gives the newer parkmakers less of a chance to prove themselves and makes it all about winning. On top of that, part of the charm of the game is balancing when and where to use your top picks and your bottom picks. The whole LL vs RCT2 angle already gives it an interesting twist - no need to get gimmicky. If anything, I think something could be done to make the playoffs a little more interesting. After 10 weeks it all comes down to one match to decide the finalists. That's how it was before and while it does make for interesting strategy, it still means 2 parkmakers out of 10 are responsible for the success or failure of the team in the post-season. Maybe some kind of round-robin system would work where the playoff teams all play matches and then the teams with the best records in those matches move on. Single elimination does have a certain do or die charm to it though, I only wish there was a way to involve more people on each team in the deciding matches.

Might be cool to do best of 3 or even 5 in the playoffs, and set the slate clean in terms of who can work with who.
Just an excuse to make more sexy parks