General Chat / Whos gonna be in the Superbowl?
- 16-January 04
-
MightyMouse Offline
Please tell me your only saying that because your replying in a sports topic.I hate my life and want to die.
-
Jellybones Offline
"Everybody hates me!"I hate my life and want to die.
"Well why do you suppose that?"
"...because I'm the son of the devil."
"That's a good reason. Any others?" -
`sfkstyle Offline
jesus christ, thank you for the fucking information, I needed itWell, I wouldn't care.
Because, sports suck.
[I don't need to say that in every sport thread, but hey, why not.]
thats fucking fresh, huh ...I hate my life and want to die.
-
minnimee85 Offline
I still say indy should have won..that final posession, they were being so badly held, it was like they were best freinds hugging for the first time in years. The fact that indy was still in it at that point shows just how weak the pats really are..
Im gonna go with panthers over the Pats... 21-14 -
Toon Offline
OK, really I'm not just picking on you.I still say indy should have won..that final posession, they were being so badly held, it was like they were best freinds hugging for the first time in years. The fact that indy was still in it at that point shows just how weak the pats really are..
Im gonna go with panthers over the Pats... 21-14
Indy was outplayed every in every aspect of this game. As for the refs not calling the holding, yeah it looked like there was on the 3rd down play, but not on the 4th down play. Still, if the refs were letting it go both ways during the whole game of course they're not going to call it then. How can you call the team with the best regular season record and a Superbowl in the last two years weak? Personally I hate the Pats and the Panthers and probably won't even watch the game. I wouldn't be surprised if this one has the lowest ratings in a very long time.
As for the game itself Pats, but who really knows anymore. -
minnimee85 Offline
the point i why was trying to make was that how could indy still be in it at that point? If the pats are such a great team, and indy made all the mistakes it did, the pats should have blown them out of the water.. -
OCC Offline
I hate the Pats so Panthers win and yes that was fucking bullshit Indy was getting held so bad and Brady did fumble that ball. Dont believe me go read a rule book it says to the extent that if the ball is moving around whil the player comes down and comes loose and is fumbled when he hits the ground it is to be ruled a fumble so in that extent Indy should have won and would have. -
minnimee85 Offline
Actually if you watch the replay, his knee hit the ground well before the ball came loose...it was actually a good call reversing it...I hate the Pats so Panthers win and yes that was fucking bullshit Indy was getting held so bad and Brady did fumble that ball. Dont believe me go read a rule book it says to the extent that if the ball is moving around whil the player comes down and comes loose and is fumbled when he hits the ground it is to be ruled a fumble so in that extent Indy should have won and would have.
-
Corkscrewed Offline
Yeah, but you make it sound like they were playing the Raiders or something. Indy made it this far for a reason: they're a good team. The Pats were just a lot better.the point i why was trying to make was that how could indy still be in it at that point? If the pats are such a great team, and indy made all the mistakes it did, the pats should have blown them out of the water..
Besides, the score doesn't always tell the story of the game. -
Jellybones Offline
They would have? Hah. The Pats defense shut Marvin Harrison down...all Peyton could do was throw a pick. Which reminds me, ever notice that every time Manning screws up, he walks off the field just with his hands in the air and a "Oh gosh geez!" look on his face. It's hilarious on a Kordell Stewart level.I hate the Pats so Panthers win and yes that was fucking bullshit Indy was getting held so bad and Brady did fumble that ball. Dont believe me go read a rule book it says to the extent that if the ball is moving around whil the player comes down and comes loose and is fumbled when he hits the ground it is to be ruled a fumble so in that extent Indy should have won and would have.
-
spiderman Offline
Nope, he didnt fumble. But the Patriots were still gonna win anyways.I hate the Pats so Panthers win and yes that was fucking bullshit Indy was getting held so bad and Brady did fumble that ball. Dont believe me go read a rule book it says to the extent that if the ball is moving around whil the player comes down and comes loose and is fumbled when he hits the ground it is to be ruled a fumble so in that extent Indy should have won and would have.
For the Superbowl, as I much as I would love for the Panthers to win, the Patriots are going to win. -
Nitrous Oxide Offline
It's not the point that his knee hit the ground. What he is trying to say he didn't have full control of the ball when his knee hit, then the ball came out. Also, the Patriots defense only shut down Indy is because they held like bitches.
Tags
- No Tags