General Chat / Parkmakers - Next Wave

i did not agree with much of it, what do you mean i cant keep up? i build faster them most people around here. well its not like your opinion matters or anything

I couldn't make much sense of it when it was up... not quite sure why people had been labelled members or whatever other words were on that 1-3 list... Perhaps post again, explaining yourself a bit better and backing up your statements rather than just saying what you think?

Edit- Its not worth all the trouble. I'm gonna take it back down.

Edited by MightyMouse011, 30 January 2004 - 10:55 PM.

No-one can get mad at you for your opinion... glad to be considered a "person"...

Hmmm...

Since the post has been down, i've been deleted from the members section.

Right-ho...

Edit- Its not worth all the trouble. I'm gonna take it back down.

i did not agree with much of it, what do you mean i cant keep up? i build faster them most people around here. well its not like your opinion matters or anything

I wish you the best of love when you complete your major in communications...

Well, Im going to put in my two cents here. To the so called MM. First off, where in the hell do you come off saying the parkmakers are parkmakers because they can almost execute perfectly. How the fuck can you say something is almost perfect when you dont have shit that is perfect to base it on. If I recall the game is unlimited to what you can do. Perfection is seen differently in everyone's eyes. Thus, only originality and appearal can be brought into the scene. With that said, you can conclude that the parkmakers are parkmakers because their work is appealing and appreciated by others. Again, if I can recall, the overratedness of the others is there because some people feel their work is appealing and/or apprecited it. Also, take a look at the parkmakers.... Most of them are ovberrated too. So get hell off of people's cases. Everyone is a parkmaker. The only thing that distinguishes the many parkmakers is how their work appeals to others. With that said, the only classes are:

1: Experienced
2: Intermediate
3: n00b

Dont try to create a world of "Parkmakers," "members," and "people."
And how in the hell do i come off overrated. You aint see nobody say shit about me until I was dropped off the list. All they said was "it was sad to see me go."

ya, i thought it was silly he used the words parkmakers, people, and members.

Being that everyone who plays RCT is by definition a parkmaker, everyone here with the exception of maybe Ed is most definately a person, and I beleive that to post on these forums you need to be a member.

Well, Im going to put in my two cents here. To the so called MM. First off, where in the hell do you come off saying the parkmakers are parkmakers because they can almost execute perfectly. How the fuck can you say something is almost perfect when you dont have shit that is perfect to base it on. If I recall the game is unlimited to what you can do. Perfection is seen differently in everyone's eyes. Thus, only originality and appearal can be brought into the scene. With that said, you can conclude that the parkmakers are parkmakers because their work is appealing and appreciated by others. Again, if I can recall, the overratedness of the others is there because some people feel their work is appealing and/or apprecited it. Also, take a look at the parkmakers.... Most of them are ovberrated too. So get hell off of people's cases. Everyone is a parkmaker. The only thing that distinguishes the many parkmakers is how their work appeals to others. With that said, the only classes are:

1: Experienced
2: Intermediate
3: n00b

Dont try to create a world of "Parkmakers," "members," and "people."
And how in the hell do i come off overrated. You aint see nobody say shit about me until I was dropped off the list. All they said was "it was sad to see me go."

Agreed.

My thoughts: the list is causing a lot more tension than needed. It seems like people are more worried about being on the list, moving up on it and being recognized rather than making parks and actually producing a finished product. Although iris freely posted the list, I think it may be a bit unnecessary because it's really just those who are deciding the Parkmakers that need to know 'who's hot'.

need to know 'who's hot'.

[font="Arial"]I'm hot, and that is all that matters.[/font]

I totally agree.

Don't get me wrong, iris, I appreciate the recognititon, I guess, and it has motivated me to an extent, but I think it is causing people to look for status on the site rather than make parks for fun.

Edit- Its not worth all the trouble. I'm gonna take it back down.

Edited by MightyMouse011, 30 January 2004 - 10:56 PM.

If you don't like what I have to say, make your own list, and put me on the bottom, sweetheart, cause I'm done wasting my time with you.

someone has an attitude.

Maturity flows through these boards like a rushing river...

As for those people that think that the list should be done away with, I don't see why. I honestly haven't seen too much controversy aside from the MM post that was recently made (and I still don't understand what you were trying to say, so either clarify it or retract it, cause as it stands, not many others can comprehend what you are saying at the moment).

It's a freakin' list made by a 17-year-old RCT player. No offense to iris, but please guys, grow up. Anyone that gets upset over the views of one person needs a real reality check.

See, the controversy is back. Now isn't this more fun? I'm just going to say what I've always said. Anyone who completes a park is a parkmaker. You don't need a special title or permission to do it. There are people on this site and other sites who are great parkmakers and continue to create great parks without having the Parkmaker title next to their name.

There are some non-parkmakers here who are good enough to compare to the "official" parkmakers. There are some that are very close to that level and some who still need to practice a bit to improve their skill with the game. Then there are other members who need a lot of work but they'll get there eventually too if they want to. It's fun to argue and debate about who's the best. But don't take it too seriously. The list shouldn't get in the way of actually making what you want to make.

Hey Freak
I'm sick of your bitching about maturity.
No one really cares about the maturity level of NE members, and no one cares how old everyone is. That's the whole point of the website. Are you saying, if toon or Meretrix or Kai etc made the list, it would be better?
I think it's retarted that all your posts bash someone's maturity.

Micool, I may be old, but I'm far from mature....

Edit- Its not worth all the trouble. I'm gonna take it back down.

Edited by MightyMouse011, 30 January 2004 - 10:57 PM.