(Archive) Advertising District / venicia

  • sfgadv02%s's Photo
    Youre work reminds me of BChillerR, all these squashed architecture right after another. ;)
  • John%s's Photo

    ^thats what i assumed...i like it...i guess it was good enough for spotlight so...ya...

    Don't assume a spotlight means automatic popular material. ;) I can appreciate it for the scope of the entire thing, but it was bad.
  • Steve%s's Photo

    Youre work reminds me of BChillerR, all these squashed architecture right after another. ;)

    really?

    *finds his park*

    o yeah...i guess so...but he's way better than me...

    and the park is coming nicely...should be up for d/l in about less than a week...

    :D
  • Metropole%s's Photo

    whoa whoa whoa!

    everybody settle down...let me explain a little:

    this was in no way intended to be based upon the acual city of Venice...it was late, and wasnt really thinking strait...this park does however have some roman flare to it...(columns, marble walls, ect.) i will also try to tie-in some roman names...as far as my "2x2" style goes: i like it. imo i think it looks really good. its really either you hate it or like it. like euroscape i guess...except everyone loves that park...

    well, i hope this clears things up for you all. and for the name: i will think of a new one...but i am open to suggestions, so feel free to help...

    and my mexicana gardens is still up and running, and i am still continuing with it...

    two new screens in the album! scroll 2 the top of page one!

    and thanx for all the good replies, who ever said they liked it...

    *phew*

    2x2 can be good.........if you don't use it to much and you don't make it totally dull. Unfortunatly, i see your park doing both. It will be overused. Infact, it has been overused. I can't count the amount of times i've seen a screenshot almost identical to that. And it is dull....any originality in there at all? No...not that I see.

    Lastly, good replies aren't necesarily the ones saying that they liked it. Good replies are those that give you useful feedback.

    Metro B)
  • CoasterkidMWM%s's Photo
    Very 2X2, but I like the look you have going. Coasters?
  • Steve%s's Photo

    Coasters?

    yeah...an LIM launched spagetti bowl coaster and a mini roller coaster for da kiddies...

    :)
  • A14504%s's Photo
    better question: Pictures????
  • Lucifer%s's Photo

    I thought euroscape was a great park and the archy was fine imo.

    ~NC~

    If you say the word "archy" one more time, i will strangle you and take your soul down below.


    That is all - Please continue your friendly park debate. :flame: :yikes:
  • Steve%s's Photo
    im almost there... ;)

    overview- Nov. 30th
  • John%s's Photo
    Um... erm... yeah. There's nothing to it. No landscaping/land variation, no real "apparent" theme, no real noticable rides... Even the coasters seem to be lacking. :( The architecture looks all identical, sans the three separate color schemes. It doesn't appear to be Roman/Venetian themed nor are there any apparent "Roman flares". It's really just "bleh", IMO.
  • -coasterdude556-%s's Photo
    Hmmmm, looks almost nothing like the venice I've seen in other pictures, needs a whole ton more canals! and foliage! and the archy is wayyyy too repetitive! I'm sorry but you didn't really capture a venician/italian feel, I do like the LIM spaghetti bowl though... Oh and mix your paths, trust me, it would look a lot better!
  • Marshy%s's Photo
    Sorry Steven..

    But that overview sucks.

    Nothing there, looks like no atmosphere, easily rushed, LIM too plain.
  • Critic%s's Photo
    It's monotonous and boring, there's no atmosphere, the coaster(s) are low-grade, and it looks nothing like a Roman City or Venice.



    I think that about summs it up.
  • artist%s's Photo

    I thought euroscape was a great park and the archy was fine imo.

    ~NC~

    If you say the word "archy" one more time, i will strangle you and take your soul down below.


    That is all - Please continue your friendly park debate. :flame: :yikes:

    Can you find me another time i have said ARCHY in this topic?

    No so shut up.

    :w00t:

    lol..

    ~NC~
  • sloB%s's Photo
    Just stop saying it.
  • artist%s's Photo
    Stopped.
  • Janus%s's Photo
    It could be worse. Some n00bs at rct2.com has started saying "archary" instead...

    The park looks boring, monotone, and flat, and lacks any real meaning. Just a lot of pointless identical 2x2's thrown together.
  • sloB%s's Photo

    It could be worse. Some n00bs at rct2.com has started saying "archary" instead...

    How the hell do you get that from architecture. I'm not surprised, actually.
  • GuestPoseidon%s's Photo
    Personally I dont think 2x2 is that bad. If you use it right and mix it up a bit, it could come out pleasantly nice. Just work on it and add a bit more variation to it because I must say, the continuous brick is getting boring. Hey, you'll never know, it can turn out to be good in the end.

Tags

  • No Tags

Members Reading