General Chat / Graffiti is it art?

  • Dantheman%s's Photo
    At my community college at the moment I have to write a report on urban culture to pass my English basic diploma. Now its state that I have to have a few people’s opinions on the subject. So do you consider it art or an eyesore?
  • Junior%s's Photo
    It's art because you use paint :yup: .
  • Blitz%s's Photo
    It's art.
  • Coaster Ed%s's Photo
    Depends what you mean by grafitti. Taking a can of spray paint and writing your name on a wall is grafitti but it isn't art. If you actually try to reprent something than it's definately art.
  • Critic%s's Photo
    Aesthetically, it is art, as it isn't just regular handwriting, there is a unique style and method of doing graffiti that would make it art.


    I would not consider it art in general, because the purpose is not meant to be as an aesthetically pleasing symbol.
  • Rohn Starr%s's Photo
    I agree with Coaster Ed on this. Although some graffiti is very artistic, IMO, unless the 'artist' is actually painting a picture as opposed to tagging, I wouldn't consider it to be a form of art.
  • Westy%s's Photo
    Depends on the graffiti.

    Someone wrote "Band Fags" outside the bandroom doors at my high school. That is not art.

    The giant mural type graffiti that I've seen in Kansas City, Chicago, Minneapolis, New York, San Francisco, etc. are art.

    Words alone cannot be classified as art.
  • `sfkstyle%s's Photo

    Band Fags

    some people are so clever, and when they have nothing better to do... de Jesùs! idiots.
  • Janus%s's Photo
    Graffiti is art, tags are not.
  • cg?%s's Photo
    Much like what everyone else has said, vandalizing someone’s property just for the sake of vandalizing someone’s property, is not art. However, it (like most everything else, actually) can be raised to the level of an art, if you do it correctly.

    There are actually quite a few books on the art of graffiti, and artists even have websites to show theirs off!

    Finally, let us not forget the numerous people working in the commercial field, and in the world of both fine and degenerate art, who while not technically doing graffiti, are using the methods of graffiti in a more refined, legal, and perhaps artistic, method.

    In other words, stuff like this (Banksy, the first example which came to mind), can most certainly be considered art. Actually, what else could you consider it? It is art, through and through.
  • mantis%s's Photo
    Keith Haring is art.
  • Andrew%s's Photo
    If art is self expression in physical form, than graffiti is art.

    The question is, is it good art or not, and that varies case to case.
  • x-sector%s's Photo
    Its art.

    I have tons of books on graffiti right now as its what I love. I considering doing stencil graffiti for my next project at college.
  • Scorchio%s's Photo
    Graffiti is definetely art, and I reckon if it's done properly (as in no offensive language or such), it looks kick arse!
  • Lucifer%s's Photo

    Graffiti is definetely art, and I reckon if it's done properly (as in no offensive language or such), it looks kick arse!

    Just because its done "properly" doesn't mean its art.


    Grafitti as an Art, to me, is very symbolic. Those who can represent thier symbolism, thoughts, ideas, and selflessness into writing, and color are artists. Those who just grafitti on a wall, without any emotion arn't artists, just vandals - even if it does look "kick ass".
  • RaoulXpres%s's Photo
    It's definatly art. Art is about expression, and even just a simple tag with someones name is expression. just my opinion though

Tags

  • No Tags

Members Reading