General Chat / 2004 Presidential Election

  • Tyler%s's Photo
    Bush will not get re-elected. Hillary will be the next president of the United States.

    Discuss!
  • `sfkstyle%s's Photo
    she's not running.
  • Corkscrewed%s's Photo
    Name one Democrat who will oppose Bush.





    Thought so. It's sad, but unless any Dem. gets a big name out, Bush may just win by default. Cheap bastard.

    My choice right now is Dick Gephart, and that's just because he said, of Bush, "This president... has been a miserable failure." Shows you how well the Democrats have been with name recognition.
  • Rohn Starr%s's Photo
    Who all has declared for the Dems? I haven't heard of any names that really stick out enough to actually give Bush a real run for the money. Let alone anyone that has really said anything other than bashing Bush.
  • Radu%s's Photo
    Why does everybody assume that since I supported the war, that I must support anything Republican?

    I don't think Bush is all that great of a president, either. I've said that numorous times. At the same time, I can't think of any of the Democratic candidates that I'd rather have as President. The only candidate that has a chance is Howard Dean, only because he's "woo'd" all of the Bush haters. He supported tax cuts under Clinton, but hates Bush's. He voted in favor of the "Iraqi Liberation Act" of 1998 (even suggesting a pre-emptive, unilatteral attack if necissary), and then voted against a simular bill under Bush. I wish I could find the exact quote of him saying that to Congress. It was on the Drudge Report a few months ago, but I can't find it now, so no, I don't have a link.

    Anyway, I would stay out of this discussion, except for that you called me by name, so I'm dropping in my 2 cents. That's all.
  • cg?%s's Photo
    There are absolutely no decent democratic cantidates, and the only person with any chance of defeating Bush is Hilary. And while she isn't running, if she actually cares about her party, she will.

    But, this is assuming I could actually vote, I wouldn't vote for anyone running - even if Hilary Clinton decided to run.

    No matter what happens with this election, our country will just decend further into the shithole Bush placed us in.

    Even if Howard Dean wins - mainly because he's Bush in every way, except politics (and most of his political ideas seemed more bullshit, being spewed to win an election, than anything else)

    Anywho...
  • Jellybones%s's Photo
    Howard Dean? Christ...I love all the hippies of Vermont as much as the next guy, but putting Ben, Jerry, or Trey Anastasio in charge of the country wouldn't be much different than this guy.
  • lazyboy97O%s's Photo
    Bush is going to win. He's been a successful war time president, and some are predicting the economy to really pick uo in a few months. Bush would really have to fuck to loose, besides non of the Democrats have any sort of agenda, all they do is bash Bush.
  • Cap'n Quack%s's Photo

    Bush is going to win. He's been a successful war time president, and some are predicting the economy to really pick uo in a few months. Bush would really have to fuck to loose, besides non of the Democrats have any sort of agenda, all they do is bash Bush.

    I love everything you post
  • JFK%s's Photo

    Why does everybody assume that since I supported the war, that I must support anything Republican?

    Because you're a pretend-democrat, you fucking pillowbiting tosser.
    I mean, just look at this shit...

    I don't think Bush is all that great of a president, either. I've said that numorous times.

    Why? You've never given a fucking reason (other than, it makes you look cool). Anywayz, you followed it with...

    The only candidate that has a chance is Howard Dean, only because he's "woo'd" all of the Bush haters. He supported tax cuts under Clinton, but hates Bush's. He voted in favor of the "Iraqi Liberation Act" of 1998 (even suggesting a pre-emptive, unilatteral attack if necissary), and then voted against a simular bill under Bush. I wish I could find the exact quote of him saying that to Congress.

    I love how, when it comes to the democrats, you have actual reasons to dislike certain politickal faggots.

    Really, dumbfuck, your efforts to appear unbiased are fucking hilarious to watch. Insincere faggots like you make me want to puke out my fucking intestines.
    But hey, why make any intelligent arguments, when you can run around pretending to be open-minded?

    And then you piss and moan about the fact that I pound your stupid worthless fucking ass time after time. Well, no fucking shit. Perhaps if you were less of a moronic dipshit, you wouldn't have these troubles? Believe me, you cornpole sack of shit, I bite your microscopic, limp dick for a very good reason.

    Gardner said it best, though...
    Robert Montu: When you were Frost Radu was somewhat less stupid - although all the more annoying because of it. He was trying for both Conservative, Liberal, Socialist, Facist, Centrist, and most every other political 'ist' ever conceived (which I guess what Centrist is, but, um, uh, yeah). You know - that just doesn't work. He made a peice of shit psuedo-Liberal.
    Robert Montu: I mean - you can't really say you hate Bush, but agree with most everything he does.

    Seriously, Radu, being a pussy is fucking gay. Cut that shit out. It sickens me, faggot-boy.
    Plus, you're just dumb. Which annoys the living shit out of me.
    As for the 2004 presidential election? Bush will win. There. DisCUSSion over.

    [final note - I tried to think of a way to include "simular" into this post, but sadly, couldn't Chauncey Gardner up with anything.]
  • JBruckner%s's Photo
    7 teared your ass up Radu.

    Anyways.

    I have not even heard of any major canidates that I'm interested in. Sadly I think that Bush is going to win again.

    Unless something spactacilur happens.
  • Jellybones%s's Photo
    Hmm, just found out Wesley Clark was running as a Democrat. I think he would know how to clean up the Iraq mess, if nothing else.
  • Radu%s's Photo
    Most likely, Hillary will also run. Most experts have been expecting her to run ever since she released her last book. The timing of it was definitetly stategic. (The same weekend that Ann Coulter released a book bashing the Clintons... convenient).

    Before, she was saying that she "had no plans to run". Now, Bill is saying it's a 50/50 "maybe". Which, basicly, just gives her time to campaign... I mean "book tour"... and keep Republicans from digging up dirt on her.

    Unlike the other candidates, she can come in late, and still jump to the front-runner possition, just because of her popularity, and everybody knows where she stands. I would not be surprised, at all, if this is a "Bush-Clinton" election.

    Instead of this being a Pro-Republican or Pro-Democrat election, it's probably just going to be Pro-Bush or Anti-Bush. That's why you're not going to have Leiberman or Kent running, because Democrats are going to step behind the most Anti-Bush candidate they can find. Either Dean or Clinton.
  • aero21%s's Photo
    "7" you need to either post something worthwhile or shut your piehole. Your post was an exercise in cursing rather than intelligent debate. It's people like you that have this country in a downward spiral in regards to ethics. You don't even know Radu, and yet you make uninformed judgements to fullfill your own ego, nice.

    As far as an election goes, Hilary would be commiting political suicide to jump in now. Think about it, Bush gets re-elected and he doesn't follow through on what he promises. Hillary steps up in 2008 and doesn't have to worry about Bush running again, she therefore becomes the automatic Democrat favorite for pres. If she runs now we will have another Reagan/Mondail election where the Dems look like fun but no one cares. The plain truth is that Bush can't loose barring a huge colapse in support from his supporters. Every pre-election poll including Bush vs an actual democratic candidate has Bush winning by large margins.
  • `sfkstyle%s's Photo

    "7"  you need to either post something worthwhile or shut your piehole.  Your post was an exercise in cursing rather than intelligent debate.

    indeed. :)
  • JBruckner%s's Photo

    "7"  you need to either post something worthwhile or shut your piehole.  Your post was an exercise in cursing rather than intelligent debate.  It's people like you that have this country in a downward spiral in regards to ethics.  You don't even know Radu, and yet you make uninformed judgements to fullfill your own ego, nice.

    He lives in the U.K.

    Sorry just had to get it out before he trys to tear you apart because of it.
  • JFK%s's Photo

    Sorry just had to get it out before he trys to tear you apart because of it.

    Damn you. I was going to have fun with that one.
    And I tore Radu's ass up much worse at The Dent.

    Anyway...

    "7" you need to either post something worthwhile or shut your piehole.

    The minute you actually post anything worthwhile, I'll let you judge, buddy. Actually, I'll do more and blow my own head off. Deal? Sweet.
    Haha. "Piehole".

    Your post was an exercise in cursing rather than intelligent debate.

    90% of Radu's posts are an exercise in tedious, self-important, arrogant bullshit of no fucking interest to anyone. At all. I'm just trying to do my part to balence out the universe, man. I'm a fucking hero, and shit.

    It's people like you that have this country in a downward spiral in regards to ethics.

    Ethics? Who gives a shit about those?
    What the fuck is this, Maury fucking Povich?
    But I'll humour your attempt at profound social commentary. What is actually putting the country in a downward spiral in regards to ethics are fucking self-righteous pencil dicked shits who feel inclined to make up for their testicular misfortune by imposing their opinions on everyone else. Regardless of the fact that not that many people give a shit, and they're ranting about shit which doesn't even fucking matter.
    Actually, that all sounds vaguely familiar.

    You don't even know Radu, and yet you make uninformed judgements to fullfill your own ego, nice.

    Uninformed judgements? Hardly. The guy is pompous fucking idiot. I mean, look at this. He's too much of a fucking pussy to even begin to counter me, so he gets his brother do it instead.
    Actually, it's probably more to do with him being "above" flaming. Because, as we all know, he shits gold. And you're talking to me about ego? That little fucker practically redefined the word.

    I'll tell you what, though. I love him for making FluxD comedy club funny. Him, judging comedy. What a hilarious concept.
  • Corkscrewed%s's Photo
    Haha... Aero.. I think Radu would be more understanding of 7 than you. Go ask him about it. He'll explain. ;)
  • Jellybones%s's Photo
    Sure, Radu is way smarter than Git, but at least Git's posts are entertaining and not boring as shit.
  • JFK%s's Photo
    Yes, Radu will always be much smarter than I.
    He is like a rock, talking to me, it is like a space probe from genius coming down to Indiana...

Tags

  • No Tags

Members Reading