RCT Discussion / PPASTF - Pre-Panel Accolade Scoring Task Force

Remind me again what the point of scoring old parks is if we're just gonna give them shit ones?

Comparability?

 

Reminds me again what the point of panelists is if their opinion is just an echo of someone else's opinion from fifteen years ago, rather than your own personal opinion which you are brought onto the panel for?

 

 

If it was up to me we wouldn't be scoring these, but since we are, let's do it properly...

Comparability?

 

Reminds me again what the point of panelists is if their opinion is just an echo of someone else's opinion from fifteen years ago, rather than your own personal opinion which you are brought onto the panel for?

 

 

If it was up to me we wouldn't be scoring these, but since we are, let's do it properly...

 

Giving spotlights 75% and Designs 50% doesn't feel like we're doing it properly to me. 

Both the RCT2 and the LL list are exhausted now. What remains are some parks that weren't added to the database properly and still need to get 10 community votes. For the sake of consistency, I think we need to do these too (listed in first post), and then I'll close this topic.

BTW, is it 10 or 12 votes?  I see parks with 10 only but thought it changed to 12.  I'm torn on whether I'd want a score on Glasshouse, but it technically has 10 votes and don't know what the criteria is or why it's not on your To Do list.  Is it cos you guys added it while I was gone?  Toon's Stratford was voted on cos I supplied it and it got (10) votes...just wondering.

We changed it over the years based on involvement. Currently it's 14-2=12 for RCT2, and 12-2=10 for LL.