(Archive) Advertising District / Long-awaited PKD2003 Update!

This isn't just a realistic park. It's a real park. Still I have yet to have anything in specific pointed out to me that is inaccurate. I would appreciate it if, for once, someone could do that for me.

RCDB only scrapes the surface for park pictures, I have over 10 sources that I use for actual park pics for this recreation including my own collection, not just pictures of their coasters.

PS, for all of you who hate my recreation, I found another PKD version for RCTII that I'm sure you'll all prefer. Here's the link, enjoy!

A park that is real is realistic you dumb ass. Hence the word REAListic. We have pointed out that you need to improve the buildings. I have looked at pictures of the real park and frankly, the buildings look nothing like the way they do in your park.

HT

A realistic park to me is defined as a fantasy park following the styles of existing parks. This, contrary to what some people seem to believe, is my RECREATION of the actual park.

NE has to be the most childish forum I've ever visited for the amount of profanity used to pathetically try and make a point.

Wait til the park's finished, and then judge it. OK?

Then do not show screens unifinished and get all angry, because they are not finished, so we comment on what is done, okay. Then you will not get criticism on things that look horrible because they are unfinished.

HT

Excuse me, you're saying that I'm the angry one?

Feedback is perfectly welcome, as long as I get something to work with. So far, I have nothing.

NE is definitely the most critical RCTII crowd on the web, and that's fine to an extent. As long as it doesn't turn a topic created to give an update on a work-in-progress into a cussing fistfight.

Okay, this is my final comment that there will be that is me talking to you blast coaster, all my other comments following this will be about the park only.

People are extremely critical here at NE because NE has some of the best RCT parkmakers, hence the criticise on what they feel is neccessary. Don't worry though, you can always pull out the old,"Well I'd like to see you do something better in RCT2".

HT

you aren't taking us seriously... that is my only complaint.
And frankly, the little things aren't what you are missing here.
You remind me of a foolish abstract artist defending his work, refusing to admit that his talent in art is non-existent (which is why he feels "emotion" is enough cause to be called art).
This is the way this board works, only 2 reasons you would ever post here in this forum.
1) you are "seriously" looking for criticism
2)you are extremely gifted

tell you what, the next time i say "it looks too blocky" or "there isn't enough detail", don't assume I'm trying to make you look bad and start rebuilding or adding something or subtracting something or looking at something from a different perspective instead of whining about how people on this forum are childish potty mouths. There are much better parkmakers I could waste my crits on...

(just so you know though, the first mistake you "actually" made was posting this as "long awaited" which it wasn't, suggesting to the forumgoers that you were better than you really are. This in itself causes much annoyance for us, so be wary of your cocky atittude. Unlike other places, we WILL call you on this sort of thing)

Thanks, HeArTlInEtWiStEr. I would appreciate that.

Blitz-sama, you obviously don't know why I titled it 'long-awaited'. Due to my site being down, I was unable to upload any new screens of the park for almost a month when I had said to expect the next update in one week. During that time, I received numerous emails asking when they would be out.

All of the complaints have followed the same lines, saying that I need to include more detail in the park, and vague statements that I need to try and make the park come alive. You need to take me seriously when I say what kind of feedback will help me. If someone can give me ONE SINGLE example in the park of how I can improve ONE SINGLE building or ONE SINGLE ride in the park to look more accurate, I would definitely take that into consideration. You see, to a real park maker, that's the kind of feedback that comes in handy.

Another point: I am waiting to visit PKD this season to take a pictures of the park, and see what landscaping there is this year, and then I can add all of the scenic details. I'm not going to add any scenic fillers for the time being to please someone expecting to see a completed park.

Over 4/5ths of the feedback on this park has been positive, NE accounting for most all of the purely negitive feedback I've had, and I can guarantee you that the rest of the web other than these forums aren't sugar-coating anything and giving dishonest feedback. I've had plenty of comments from lifelong PKD-goers who have been closely following this project and giving me some good feedback to go on.

Even if you don't care for my work, the fact is that this is the most detailed and accurate PKD recreation done yet. Don't be so fast to criticize when you see a park clearly stated to be less than half done, especially when many of you have probably never even visited the park.

You need to take this for what it is. This is a RECREATION, NOT a fantasy park. Keep that in mind.