Related Games / Indiana Funland:After the Storm

  • BelgianGuy%s's Photo
    ^^BURN
  • K0NG%s's Photo

    1988
    Posted Image
    And What do you think THIS is??

    A waste of bandwidth?
  • Wolfman%s's Photo
    ^ :lol:
  • fraroc%s's Photo
    KONG&wolfman both of you stfu
  • Dark_Horse%s's Photo
    Dude, once again you didn't listen to people. We get that this is your park and your topic, but lighten up man. This is an internet forum for a computer game, just ignore people who don't give you actual advice. We want to help you, but your attitude suggests you don't want it. I know it's hard to handle criticism sometimes, but most people have you give you friendly advice.
  • fraroc%s's Photo

    Dude, once again you didn't listen to people. We get that this is your park and your topic, but lighten up man. This is an internet forum for a computer game, just ignore people who don't give you actual advice. We want to help you, but your attitude suggests you don't want it. I know it's hard to handle criticism sometimes, but most people have you give you friendly advice.

    KONG INSULTED me, I dont count that as advice,

    Advice is "Fraroc, I dont really get what that picture means, what is it"
    I would have GLADLY replied "That is a construction project for the new attraction for 1989"
  • Dark_Horse%s's Photo
    This is more of what I was talking about:

    Ok. I don't mind you ignoring the criticism, because in the end it's your park. But there's nothing here that justifies your hostile attitude.


    Kong, technically did not insult you, and he has a point. Not many people are going to care for a picture of a station lying on the ground. Try to make your picture more interesting by giving them life. Like I just said this is the internet, try to stop getting so worked up.
  • Jaguar%s's Photo

    KONG&wolfman both of you stfu


    Lol, in all seriousness, it isn't ideal for a small park to build 5 large coasters. It would've gone bankrupt just by building that large woodie in the beginning. Most parks start off small, maybe a junior coaster, a small wooden figure-8, or a galaxi coaster would be ideal. Indiana doesn't have any world class amusement parks, yet it is considered one of the best places for Rollercoasters. Just look at holiday world, it has been operating since a year after the world war, yet it didn't build its first coaster (a pinfari) since 1981. You've got to be more resourceful and logical. After building 3 Arrows, why add an obviously expensive wooden coaster.
  • fraroc%s's Photo

    Lol, in all seriousness, it isn't ideal for a small park to build 5 large coasters. It would've gone bankrupt just by building that large woodie in the beginning. Most parks start off small, maybe a junior coaster, a small wooden figure-8, or a galaxi coaster would be ideal. Indiana doesn't have any world class amusement parks, yet it is considered one of the best places for Rollercoasters. Just look at holiday world, it has been operating since a year after the world war, yet it didn't build its first coaster (a pinfari) since 1981. You've got to be more resourceful and logical. After building 3 Arrows, why add an obviously expensive wooden coaster.



    Those parks were all family owned. Hammond Amusements Corps. owns Indiana Funland.
    (Coaster History Fun Fact: HAC is a rather unknown company,because the only park they own is Indiana Funland.)
    What's all this jazz about 3 arrows? Venom is 100% pure Schwartzkopf. Rattlesnake and Swinger are Arrows.
    And the entire area where IF is devoid of coasters (Indiana Beach and Holiday World are no where near Indiana Funland.)
    So HAC gets lots of money.
  • Jaguar%s's Photo
    Indiana has parks all over it, anywhere you go, you will generally only be 3 hours from an amusement park, and if HAC only had one park, it wouldn't be much different. Also, by personal experience, Hammond (Could have picked a better city) isn't too far from Gurnee Mills, plus I wouldn't consider them a Corporation if they own only one park.
  • Austin55%s's Photo
    Dude who cares about all those things? Your location suck, your ride linups arent finacnially stable bla bla bla that a bunch of crap he doesnt need to worry about, Just Focus on making the park better, Fraroc. You have a ways to go. We dont need to see pictures of dirt unless you can make it interesting, look at Phatages RCT2 six flags and the way he made Superman: Ultimate Flight look under construction.
  • Dark_Horse%s's Photo
    Here's something realistic for ya, fraroc. Six Flags Over Texas opened in 1959 with one coaster, a Mad Mouse. Next coaster was an Arrow Mine Train Coaster (another small coaster) in 1966 (that's 7 years later). In 1969 (that's three years), a CHILDREN'S coaster (so ya know it's gonna be small) was added. A Schwarzkopf Speedracer/Extended Jumbo Jet was added in 1971 (that's another two years). The first "big" coaster that came to SFoT was Shockwave in 1978, almost 20 years after the park's opening opening.
  • Jaguar%s's Photo

    Here's something realistic for ya, fraroc. Six Flags Over Texas opened in 1959 with one coaster, a Mad Mouse. Next coaster was an Arrow Mine Train Coaster (another small coaster) in 1966 (that's 7 years later). In 1969 (that's three years), a CHILDREN'S coaster (so ya know it's gonna be small) was added. A Schwarzkopf Speedracer/Extended Jumbo Jet was added in 1971 (that's another two years). The first "big" coaster that came to SFoT was Shockwave in 1978, almost 20 years after the park's opening opening.


    Well, it was almost 40 years before Holiday World even had a coaster, and it was a crappy Pinfari. Austin55, I am just pointing out that if this is a time line park, it should be more realistic like a little dipper or a carousel park, and a picnicking area.
  • Dark_Horse%s's Photo
    Yeah, but I was pointing out that company opened parks can't normally afford big rides all the time. Since fraroc insists on being realistic and following the format of a company-owned park.
  • Jaguar%s's Photo
    Six Flags is actually going bankrupt. They are resorting to closing down parks and buying used rides, (which can be a good thing in the case of Six Flags Great America's new coaster).
  • That Guy%s's Photo
    ^Err, I think they're alright now. They paid all their debt back and restructured their company....so....unless I missed something?
  • Dark_Horse%s's Photo
    Which will most likely be the fate of the Hammond Amusements Corp. (BTW, fraroc a corps is either a large formation, or an administrative grouping of troops within an armed force with a common function such as Artillery or Signals representing an arm of service)
  • Jaguar%s's Photo
    Lol DH, I just noticed that he spelled it wrong, and That Guy, the only way I can imagine is if HAC inherited the money
  • Austin55%s's Photo
    Wait, now youre saying your park is run by a corporate military?
  • Dark_Horse%s's Photo
    Well that explains how they can afford all those coasters. Off tax dollars.

Tags

  • No Tags

Members Reading