Pro Tour 3 / Pro Tour 3

I think the biggest mistake on the judging in this round was putting two lower quality parks through, double qualifications should be saved up when there's two incredible entries, not two mediocre ones that are difficult to split. Seriously though, if Kumba had just used a guest judge as has been done up to this round there would really not have been an issue. Up to now the judging had been spot on.

Edited by deanosrs, 07 June 2007 - 12:45 PM.

I think the biggest mistake on the judging in this round was putting two lower quality parks through, double qualifications should be saved up when there's two incredible entries, not two mediocre ones that are difficult to split. Seriously though, if Kumba had just used a guest judge as has been done up to this round there would really not have been an issue. Up to now the judging had been spot on.

Helping me judge this round was the PT1 wooden coaster prelim winner, thx for the help

so quite now....

^Always knew Kumba had a split personality

Anyway, I agreed with the water ride and inverted round judging.. I have yet to check these wooden entries out in-game, so I can't say if I agree this round..

Congrats to those who got in, see you in the main round

SF

So two judges couldn't pick one of those parks above the other?! Shocker

Kumba won

SF

I have a question: Can the judges enter the final round, or are they only allowed to judge, to keep things fair?

I have a question: Can the judges enter the final round, or are they only allowed to judge, to keep things fair?

Judges aren't allowed to enter. As you say it wouldn't be fair.

seriously. i should be a judge.

you're too sarcastic to be a judge

he's only sarcastic on the forums

also irl sarcastic.

but i know my rollercoaster tycoon.

He should be a judge.

Toon Says:

This was absolutely the toughest park for me to judge. On one hand it showed the absolute brilliance of how to use hacking and minute detail to enhance a park. Some of the little touches here were absolutely brilliant and it was very obvious that everything was done for a reason. On the other hand, for me, this park had no flow and was busy, cluttered and generally tough to look at. I’m absolutely convinced that this park turned out how it was intended but for it to finish first a park has to have aesthetic quality as well.

Tracid Says:

i don't know. this park just didn't do it for me.
and/or, your avatar is complete and utter shit.
burned amirite



As punishment for lampooning a longtime friend, I will not have enough time to enter the B&M round.
(that totally makes logical sense)

alright so i wouldn't write my review, i would just judge the parks dammit seriously i'd be really good at it.

^I actually think I would be a better judge than you. Judges should enjoy writeing long and boring paragraphs, when all they could say is this park sucks, or it's freakin' awesome. According to Panic, I'm one of those who writes long and boring paragraphs that will "only be read by the ever-patient Turtle."

^Are you for real?

^I actually think I would be a better judge than you. Judges should enjoy writeing long and boring paragraphs, when all they could say is this park sucks, or it's freakin' awesome. According to Panic, I'm one of those who writes long and boring paragraphs that will "only be read by the ever-patient Turtle."

hahahahaha.

Oh dear, I would think SU182 would be a better judge than Xin.

^Are you for real?

No. Every mention of my name is a figment of your imagination.

No. Every mention of my name is a figment of your imagination.

Shhhhhhhhh

You hear something?

I no longer acknowledge Xin's existence.