(Archive) Advertising District / Dump-Place

  • Goliath123%s's Photo
    Good, bad or Holy shit thats ugly, What do you think?

    Posted Image
  • Dark_Horse%s's Photo

    Holy shit


    It's not ugly or bad, it's just...Idk.

    Edited by Dark_Horse, 08 October 2009 - 11:15 PM.

  • sixflagsfreak56%s's Photo
    Holy shit that is ugly.
  • Nokia%s's Photo
    unfinshed, duh.

    Posted Image
  • Dark_Horse%s's Photo
    Not sure about the support color, Nokster, but looking good otherwise.
  • RCTNW%s's Photo
    Nokia - The supports at that height and force need the angled in support to go with the vertical support. Also, you need to move the path out on that one side so the support footer is in side the fense line vise outside on the path. Other than that, it's not bad but still need work.

    Goliath123 - Sorry but not a fan of the supports . I think it's too much even for a California coasters

    Faas - Not bad. What is the building for?
  • Bender%s's Photo

    Good, bad or Holy shit thats ugly, What do you think?

    Posted Image

    WALL OF WOOD OMG °_°

    Nokia: I really like it, the supports are well done. Nice.
  • Wanted%s's Photo
    I like the layout on Pudding's coaster. Hate the foilage.

    I dislike the layout on RRP's coaster. Love the scenery.
  • Wolfman%s's Photo

    Good, bad or Holy shit thats ugly, What do you think?

    Posted Image

    It's about two layers of support, too much.

    Imagine having to drill the anchors/footers for each point that the coaster rests upon? That would be insane. That can't possibly be right.

    Here, I found a rare image of Cedar Point's Mean Streak. Notice to the left, that the taller support structure doesn't actually slant all the way to the ground? It sort of stops, and then the structure changes to vertical structure.

    Posted Image

    Here's another example. Notice the supports are mostly virtical. Not spread out.

    Posted Image

    I hope this helps.
    :mantis:

  • J K%s's Photo
    Nice example Wolfie! ;)

    I like the look of them but as Wolfman said they're just a bit too high.
  • RMM%s's Photo
    great post wolfman. didn't expect that out of all the recent posts.
  • Goliath123%s's Photo
    Ok thanks everyone!
  • Wolfman%s's Photo

    great post wolfman. didn't expect that out of all the recent posts.


    Thanx!
  • Timothy Cross%s's Photo

    Posted Image
    What you guys think of this lay-out?


    Nobody commented on this, so I brought it over. Layout to me looks... idk, I'm an idiot at coasters. Any comments on Pudding's layout?
  • turbin3%s's Photo
    Posted Image
    Chances are really high, that this gets finished. :)
    I've holidays now, so much time to build on it.

    Comments are welcome.
  • SSSammy%s's Photo
    never thought id hear myself saying this

    deco piece overload, buddy :lol:

    especially on the green building, id try to tone that down a little, not everything neets outlining in sharpie.
  • Wolfman%s's Photo

    Posted Image
    What you guys think of this lay-out?

    Reminds me of SF's Batman.
  • Wolfman%s's Photo

    Posted Image
    Chances are really high, that this gets finished. :)
    I've holidays now, so much time to build on it.

    Comments are welcome.

    Wow! nice tiny structures. I could steal learn something from this guy.
  • Luketh%s's Photo
    Pudding, that layout is fine, reminds me of Superman Ultimate Flight @ SFOG.

    Love that screen, Turbin3, but as Sammy said.. Deco piece overload.
  • CedarPoint6%s's Photo
    ^ Are you sure your thinking of SFOG's Superman... considering that it's not even remotely similar...? Except for maybe color.

    It's not a bad layout, although perhaps a little short. The flow is more or less there, although I don't like seeing curves out of zero g rolls. I think they need straight entry and straight exit. Other then that, it's a pretty good layout although you may want to find a way to avoid that flat section before the final helix. That could make it a lot stronger.

Tags

  • No Tags

Members Reading