(Archive) Advertising District / Dump-Place

  • Louis!%s's Photo
    ^Ummmm...no they dont.

    Kawasemi
    Piraten

    These are clearly not the same layout.

    There is also Dream of Meditteranean and the Unknown one going into Happy Valley Shanghai but I'm not entirely sure of their layouts.
  • Maverix%s's Photo
    ^Yes they are the same

    Here IS a layout plan for Piraten

    And Here Is the layout for Kawasemi.

    Tell me if those are not the same.
  • Louis!%s's Photo
    Can't see the second picture.

    And if you compare the stats they arent the same at all.

    Kawasemi:

    Length: 2454' 5"
    Height: 108' 11"
    Speed: 54.2 mph
    Max Vertical Angle: 67.4 Degrees

    Piraten:

    Length: 2477'
    Height: 105'
    Speed: 55.9 mph
    Max Vertical Angle: 70 Degrees

    They may follow the same layout etc but they arent the same.
  • Video_Kid%s's Photo
    Kawasemi
    http://www.coastersa...wasemi1001g.jpg
  • Liampie%s's Photo

    Can't see the second picture.

    And if you compare the stats they arent the same at all.

    Kawasemi:

    Length: 2454' 5"
    Height: 108' 11"
    Speed: 54.2 mph
    Max Vertical Angle: 67.4 Degrees

    Piraten:

    Length: 2477'
    Height: 105'
    Speed: 55.9 mph
    Max Vertical Angle: 70 Degrees

    They may follow the same layout etc but they arent the same.


    Speed may be different because Denmark's climate is nothing like China's climate. Kawasemi is placed above a lake, and therefore it's higher than Piraten. Drop angle was rounded off in Denmark for the press. I don't know why the lengths are different, but it is undeniable that the layout looks exactly the same and the tiny differences in stats don't mean much.
  • Louis!%s's Photo
    I suppose. But still there is nothing stopping a Mega-Lite having a different layout anyway. Which is what I was trying to point out.

    Edited by Louis!, 20 May 2009 - 08:43 AM.

  • Louis!%s's Photo
    Sorry for the double, but just a little something:

    Posted Image
  • nin%s's Photo
    I LOVE IT.

    Well, on first glance i did. The more i look at it, the more i see bareness, even though it's quite detailed. I dont like the inside of the arches, like the inside of the building. I don't know if you'd go so far to put a service counter or ad or something inside, but it'd help imo.
  • geewhzz%s's Photo
    louis, you're really getting good. keep at it.
  • Nokia%s's Photo
    i love you louis.
  • ][ntamin22%s's Photo
    excellent.
  • Sulakke%s's Photo
    I'm starting to really like your work, Louis! Keep it up! :)
  • Liampie%s's Photo
    Posted Image

    Not bad Louis, I like the style, but it's already becoming too repetitive. Change the front tower: Higher, flat roof, and unique ornaments. Your work is usually excellent, except for a lack of variation. :)
  • Louis!%s's Photo
    nin - Thanks :D If you're referring to the building at the back, it's going to be an information centre so yes it wont be bare inside for much longer, and inside the arches I'll probably put some sort of signage up to advertise the park's rides or whatnot.

    Gee - Thanks, means a lot.

    Nokiaa - Haha :kiss:

    ][ - Thankyou.

    Sulakke - Haha, glad to hear.

    Liampie - Yeah lol. Like I said in the compare yourself game i'm like pacman, Fun but after a while repetative :p I am working on it though. And as that is technically all one building I thought it would be ok.
  • turbin3%s's Photo
    That's amazing, Louis, I really love it! :)
  • robbie92%s's Photo
    Dude... You're getting so good! I love that structure.
  • Cena%s's Photo
    I really hate it Louis!
  • Magnus%s's Photo

    louis, you're really getting good. keep at it.


    :D
  • Goliath123%s's Photo
    Which is best? Intamin giga caster supports:



    Posted Image A

    Posted Image B

    Posted Image C

    Cast your votes, lloking for advice

    Edited by Goliath123, 22 May 2009 - 01:02 AM.

  • Sulakke%s's Photo
    A

Tags

  • No Tags

Members Reading