(Archive) Advertising District / Nameless
- 06-December 05
-
mantis Offline
Tell me, LC Blazer, when you went to a theme park which was ENTIRELY flat, had only ONE TYPE of tree and where all the buildings were almost EXACTLY the same.
It wouldn't hurt to, uh, perhaps introduce some variation into your work. -
supertrooper Offline
Tell me, LC Blazer, when you went to a theme park which was ENTIRELY flat, had only ONE TYPE of tree and where all the buildings were almost EXACTLY the same.
It wouldn't hurt to, uh, perhaps introduce some variation into your work.
I beg to differ. I counted TWO TYPES of trees (a palm tree and a fruit tree).
That coaster design in awful....just awful. -
Evil WME Offline
ej man, niet te veel geven om die nerdos daarboven hoor! Kijk echter wel ff rond naar wat inspiratie bronnen. Vaak is het handig om na te denken over hoe wat je aan het bouwen bent er in het echt uit zou zien. Dan kan je namelijk veel vloeiendere achtbanen krijgen en gebouwen die er uit zien alsof ze voor het nut dienen waarvoor ze in je park ook echt dienen! neways, veel suc6. -
RemyKO Offline
Nerdos :-D Puppies ! (Vince McMahon deken xD ) Laatmaar.. ( En Toen kwam Shane xD )
Nice Enterprise on that rocky thing.. Where have i seen that before? -
iGNiTED Offline
its dull, brown,and lifeless, with a little bit of gray and black thrown in.
i dont like it,but...whatever... -
JDP Offline
yeah the coaster design, is fake, short, and way too many sharp turns.Edited by JDP, 06 December 2005 - 03:59 PM.
-
Dark-Daxter Offline
Two lifthills for this track? :' />
Anyways, needs more variation in buildings, less flatness and more coaster.
Tags
- No Tags