I Think this a bit messier than your last screen. That yellow Roof on the station doesn't work either. The last complaint I have is the texture on the station right under the red roof is too repetitive. Other than that it's a wonderful start
Layout and supports could use a lot of work, there is also quite a lot of grey around the station. I would definitely look up real life flying coasters for ideas on layouts and supporting. Otherwise this kind of coaster and layout is going to feel really out of place in what seems to be a realistic park.
I think what is holding this screen back beyond the layout is that there is no cohesiveness. Each building holds so many different textures and architectural styles it all looks messily slapped together.
The preview makes me think this is northern Europe. The pink building at the bottom is almost spanish. The station is just a bit of everything.
I would encourage you to research pictures of architecture you want to recreate and translate those pieces into your building. Unless you're an architecture student where looking at and studying buildings is your life, building off the top of your head rarely works out well unless there is specific inspiration you have.
Not to be the no-fun-allowed guy, but I dropped the "sex" tag and substituted "sexy." There's an interesting group of parks that actually address sex in the sex tag, and unless I'm missing something this screen doesn't.
And? A little piece of advice: It's okay to upload unfinished screens, but the stuff in the screen shoud be finished (as in: it's okay to upload a screen with WIP parts, but everytinh you built in the screen should be "final" by your assessement).
11 Comments
Comment System Offline
Scoop Offline
I Think this a bit messier than your last screen. That yellow Roof on the station doesn't work either. The last complaint I have is the texture on the station right under the red roof is too repetitive. Other than that it's a wonderful start
Version1 Offline
Work on the supports a lot more, look at other parks here on NE.
And "Inverted Flying Coaster" isn't correct. It's either an "Inverted Coaster" as in this case, or a "Flying Coaster"
G Force Offline
Mattk48 Offline
I really don't like that layout. #Noflow
everything else is acceptable, just not special. I liked your last screen better
disneylandian192 Offline
#noflowx2
I think what is holding this screen back beyond the layout is that there is no cohesiveness. Each building holds so many different textures and architectural styles it all looks messily slapped together.
The preview makes me think this is northern Europe. The pink building at the bottom is almost spanish. The station is just a bit of everything.
I would encourage you to research pictures of architecture you want to recreate and translate those pieces into your building. Unless you're an architecture student where looking at and studying buildings is your life, building off the top of your head rarely works out well unless there is specific inspiration you have.
][ntamin22 Offline
Not to be the no-fun-allowed guy, but I dropped the "sex" tag and substituted "sexy." There's an interesting group of parks that actually address sex in the sex tag, and unless I'm missing something this screen doesn't.
chemist Offline
Unfinished by far btw...just a heads up
Version1 Offline
And? A little piece of advice: It's okay to upload unfinished screens, but the stuff in the screen shoud be finished (as in: it's okay to upload a screen with WIP parts, but everytinh you built in the screen should be "final" by your assessement).
chemist Offline
https://gyazo.com/f5...cda53d4104d1bd4
Update
Version1 Offline
I continue to have no idea why you are using the supports the way you do
Ling Offline
The buildings are nice, but I agree that the supports all make absolutely no sense.