Screenshot / Nameless Park - No Hacks.
-
06-March 15
-
First Park (Nameless, so far)
-
2 of 5
- Views 1,649
- Fans 0
- Comments 13
nedesigns
- Copyright © 2002-2024 New Element Designs
-
Community Forum Software by IP.Board
RCTER2 Offline
Haha you've used objects of rctWWTT
Objects from rctww suck, but I like those kissing giraffes.
So are you guys suggesting I should scrap all the rctwwtt objects then? They're not pleasing to the eye?
Nobody uses rctww and tt objects because they look like shit, if you like building with them, go on, but most of the people here won't like the objects.
The ride's a bit tall.
CSW, that is a helpful post and a good reason why I should remove the expansion pack objects. Unfortunately I do like some of the objects but I suppose I can scrap them for this park. (Hopefully I do release it!)
POKE: Too tall, as in realistically? I may not change the Steeplechase, unless I can figure out a better way to fill out 2/3rds of the park with the ride. I assumed I'd be way off in creating coasters. I'll play around with the layout in the next few days and see if I can get something decent. If not, maybe I should just choose a new type of ride to focus on.
][ntamin22: Thanks!
Rofl & RCTER2 - please be more constructive with your criticism. I can take negative criticism fairly well, as long as I can learn from it. Saying objects that "suck" or laughing at my choice of objects doesn't help me improve whatsoever.
RCTER2 Offline
There are cso ww/tt objects. if you like you can use them (look the same way but no need expansions) and people without ww/tt can still open your park. (is this suggestion positive enough?
)
RCTER2: Haha, yes, thank you
That's very helpful!!
apart from the TT objects this is pretty good for a first set of screens! the foliage doesn't really mix that well though IMO and i'm not too sure about the gold fencing combined with the bricks. also i'd avoid using path like that in a seemingly random matter when they don't really mix all that well.
also if nobody has mentioned it yet: apart from being unappealing to most in terms of looks, many people don't have the expansion packs either so people won't be able to view your parks
Aww, kissing giraffes. You've got a nice warmth going on, partly due to the colours and foliage I think. I like the coaster's route, though it may be a bit high for a single rail... or is it soapbox? But if the supports are a problem for you, have you tried the flower-box trick (where you place it in a lowered section of land under the path)?
GDP: Thanks! To each their own opinion. I'm just trying to break the colors up from the white/marble theme I have going in the buildings. I suppose brown and grey don't blend too well though, you're right! The unappealing due to expansion objects has been brought up, but I've been notified there's a custom scenery pack with the same objects. Still debating what to do. So much work would need to be redone, but I can suck it up I think. What I do for you guys...;D
Chocotopian: Thanks! It's a Steeplechase. Poke mentioned it's too high, and GammaZero happily let me know about that cheat in the game that can get of the supports in the middle of the path
Thanks everyone! I have lots of work to do, it looks like!