Getting there. Somehow you still have the tendency to make your buildings feel detached from their environment. It's hard to explain but you seperate your buildings from main paths, foliage and other buildings in such a way that it really looks detached. If you would have put the building on the main path, instead of putting it on a seperate branch of a path, you could have created beter visuals and incorporation. Now it is almost like it is a maintenance building purposefully hidden away in the back of the park, but that is not what you envisioned it to be.
You've got the right elements,but the building still doesn't feel natural. Same as the past building, you either need to close the awkward gap between the roof and the walls using sloped walls, or just go for an open frame design. I think the general shape of the building is okay, but you could use to add some utilities/chimneys/vents poking through to break up the symmetry a bit. I think with the square on top I'd actually sink it into the roof instead of sticking it out as well. Foliage is generally nice but needs some bushes/shrubs (the small leaves/flowers/mushrooms are a nice touch). You have a lot of good stuff going on here, it's just a remaining nitpicky part that will make this perfect.
This is the parks nature show building. Again trying to break my rectangular building habits up a bit. This is a family owned park, so I'm trying to get the low-budget flower gardens and stuff of that nature into the park as much as possible
4 Comments
Comment System Offline
Faas Offline
Getting there. Somehow you still have the tendency to make your buildings feel detached from their environment. It's hard to explain but you seperate your buildings from main paths, foliage and other buildings in such a way that it really looks detached. If you would have put the building on the main path, instead of putting it on a seperate branch of a path, you could have created beter visuals and incorporation. Now it is almost like it is a maintenance building purposefully hidden away in the back of the park, but that is not what you envisioned it to be.
navalin Offline
You've got the right elements,but the building still doesn't feel natural. Same as the past building, you either need to close the awkward gap between the roof and the walls using sloped walls, or just go for an open frame design. I think the general shape of the building is okay, but you could use to add some utilities/chimneys/vents poking through to break up the symmetry a bit. I think with the square on top I'd actually sink it into the roof instead of sticking it out as well. Foliage is generally nice but needs some bushes/shrubs (the small leaves/flowers/mushrooms are a nice touch). You have a lot of good stuff going on here, it's just a remaining nitpicky part that will make this perfect.
Dusty Soul Offline
Does this make it look less seperated
Faas Offline
Yes, but you put minimal effort into incorporating it by just adding some paths around the sides. But it's better.