Park / Blossom Springs
-
29-March 05
- Views 15,457
- Downloads 655
- Fans 0
- Comments 56
-
No fans of this park
-
Download Park
655
-
Tags
nedesigns
- Copyright © 2002-2024 New Element Designs
-
Community Forum Software by IP.Board
Corkscrewed Offline
Loved the enclosed weird boomerang thing, and the 9 inversions
Just listen to Steve here.
Corkscrewed Offline
I love a park just because the person making it is someone I worship. Geez, what are you, 12 again? You couldn't make a more outrageous claim if you insisted Michael Moore worked out. I like parks because they're good, not because they're made by a so-and-so. I try not to post a preference before the results are decided, but in this case, you either have to be a very loyal team member or pretty damn shallow in critiquing to say that Blossom Springs is all great and stuff. I'm not knocking the makers of that park, because I'm pretty sure they didn't really put up their full potential either. In fact, I know so, and I'm willing to bet that they didn't/don't care about how plain it was, at least not seriously.
But Aquatica is brilliant because of its creativity, use of colors, landscaping, and thrilling coaster. There's not much there, but what is looks astounding. The merging of tracks to create enclosures makes this park look almost RCT 2-like, and everything that this implies has a feeling of incredibility. Some might argue that it's bad, but I really like how this blurs the lines between RCT 1 and 2. Looking at just a screen, I wouldn't be able to tell you which game it was from for sure.
Furthermore, coasters that action-packed and inverting should have intensity levels below ten, but this one does.
The buildings are really nice, with colors and styles that appeal more to the type that I typically prefer (bright, cheery, and sunny), and the park just bristles with this aura. Compared to this park, Blossom Springs just looks plain, as though someone threw it together quickly in a week so as not to forfeit.
There's effort in this park, even though it's incomplete.
So don't go accusing ME of liking a park just because of its creator. I take personal offense to that, because it's a ridiculous statement tantamount to attacking my personal character. You're basically saying I'm shallow. Just because you didn't like it doesn't mean that those who do like it because of its creator. The way you posted, you came across as an arrogant ass hole, because you basically said "I don't like it, and my opinions are better than anyone else's. Anyone who disagrees with my superior opinion is obviously some dumb biased guy."
And if you were just joking... ignore all that.
Corkscrewed Offline
Um...Wanna show me where it says I fell in love with that one tough guy? Maybe I have some hidden text scattered throughout my post declaring my love for Aquatica. Or maybe the twitch smiley really means that Aquatica is the greatest park of all time.
Oh ok...next time why don't you know what you're talking about. Sounds to me like someone's just having a hissy fit because an unfinished park was still 100 times better then his team's finished one. Nobody elses fault but your team there Mike. Mad at the wrong people.
I thought it was pretty obvious who to vote for. Your park was just coasters and trees. Their park was just coasters and unfinished sculptures. So let's compare the coasters...one, an overdone, poorly executed, Nevis-wannabe Giga (sorry for the harshness to the makers, I just have to make a point). The other, a sprawling 9-inversion fantasy coaster that jumps on and off the map again. Hmmmm...not such a tough decision there. Or were you just upset because your team methodically placed trees in the absolute precise places and nobody noticed? The round sculpture thing in Aquatica (cant think of what its called) clearly took more time with the zero clearancing then going around and clicking the mouse button aimlessly, plopping trees everywhere. Or maybe those tiny 4 buildings really stole your heart in Blossom Springs?
You honestly sound like a complete idiot to me...since nowhere have I ever said that Aquatica was in any way, shape, or form amazing. In comparison to your weeks park, it's easily better because it's quite obvious that more time, effort, and skill when into it and planning it. I mean did you guys even plan at all for this park? There really wasn't a theme or premise behind your park I don't think...while their idea was pretty damn creative, only unfinished. It's clearly the better park and it's basically going up against a forfeit this week imo. So please enlighten me on what the hell you're talking about.
btw...was joking...but I really enjoyed your responses.