Park / Sulakke

  • 21-January 10
Park_720 Sulakke

10 Comments

  • geewhzz%s's Photo
    United States geewhzz Offline




    Sulakke



    NE Honorary Mention










    Game  RCT2        Submission Type  Design        Creator  Liampie        Score  11.46       





    (Fast Aerial)











    Attached File  100121_honorary_mention_rct2_liampie_sulakke.zip (278.8KB)
    downloads: 330
    posted 15 years ago
  • Cena%s's Photo
    Netherlands Cena Offline
    LMAO at the title, hahaha. 

    What is the reason for this not failing if I may ask the panel? Too small I think? 
    posted 15 years ago
  • Goliath123%s's Photo
    Australia Goliath123 Offline
    It didn't get a score of 13 ;)
    posted 15 years ago
  • posix%s's Photo
    Germany posix Offline
    i thought it was just too "simple" overall. not quite design level.
    posted 15 years ago
  • Liampie%s's Photo
    Netherlands Liampie Offline
    - No custom supports in place they would look good
    - No theme or concept
    - No innovation
    - Too simple

    I didn't expect this to win design and 11,46 was higher than I expected. This was never a serious project...

    Glad it's released now and I hope some people will enjoy it.
    posted 15 years ago
  • Cena%s's Photo
    Netherlands Cena Offline

    It didn't get a score of 13 ;)

    I can understand that Goliath, I was more asking, what were the reasons from the voters on the panel. 




    Edit:


    @ Liampie, thanks for explaining, might gonna check it out when I am on my other pc. 

    Edited by Cena, 21 January 2010 - 06:34 PM.

    posted 15 years ago
  • Sulakke%s's Photo
    Netherlands Sulakke Offline
    Haha, what? I didn't know about this hahaha! :p
    posted 15 years ago
  • Liampie%s's Photo
    Netherlands Liampie Offline
    Sulakke, I expect a counterattack. :p
    posted 15 years ago
  • Liampie%s's Photo
    Netherlands Liampie Offline
    Any thoughts on the layout, please? :)
    posted 15 years ago
  • CedarPoint6%s's Photo
    United States CedarPoint6 Offline
    I liked it. It was unconventional, but felt sort of believable for a custom SLC. The first drop sequence up through the loop had good thoughts like the big helix, although I thought that drop/turn combo seemed a little forced. The rest of the layout was actually pretty solid and I don't have much of anything to complain about. It has a nice flow.
    posted 15 years ago
  • Roomie%s's Photo
    United Kingdom Roomie Offline
    Yeah CP6 puts it pretty well. Its a nice little layout which is actually pretty believable. Looking at the three(ish) standard layouts Vekoma use with their SLCs its not too far fetched and that adds plenty of + points for me.
    posted 15 years ago
  • 57.31%(required: 65%)  Design Submission
    Percentage of vote: 57.31%
    SSSammy 80%
    posix 70%
    CedarPoint6 60%
    Fr3ak 60%
    geewhzz 60%
    Kumba 60%
    nin 60%
    5dave 55%
    inVersed 55%
    Six Frags 55%
    Steve 55%
    zodiac 55%
    chapelz 50%
    Evil WME 50%
    Nokia 45%
    57.31%
  • Description

    I made this coaster for the RCT-Guide coaster competition of 2009. I didn't do my best, instead I tried to create a (semi-) old-school atmosphere without copying. I had no inspiration for a theme, so I randomly put together some buildings inspired by parkmakers like Artist. It didn't create the atmosphere I wanted, but somehow it did create an atmosphere anyway. I like this in a strange way and others do too, as it won in the contest (I fucked up in the second round though). The coaster was never released as a download and I forgot about it, until I got the idea to start submitting old parks to NE to get decent download pages (Honorary Mentions at least). It got pretty close to getting Design, but it didn't win which is justified in my opinion. By the way, this coaster has nothing to do with Sulakke. The coaster was nameless and I randomly picked Sulakke to be the theme here, as a joke.

  • No fans of this park
  • Download Park 606
  • Tags