Park / Belmont Shores
-
07-June 09
- Views 48,388
- Downloads 1,981
- Fans 11
- Comments 119
-
88.75%(required: 70%) Gold
5dave 95% no Maverix 95% no Airtime 90% no inthemanual 90% no Liampie 90% no Pacificoaster 90% no Stoksy 90% no FredD 85% no Coupon 80% no Ling 80% no 88.75% 0.00% -
11 fans Fans of this park
-
Full-Size Map
-
Download Park
1,981
-
Objects
432
-
Tags
So what you basically say is that...
you want to have ~ 53 votes? ^^
We just had a european election with a participation of 40 percent in average. The people aren't interested in democratic processes anymore xD
B²T: I REALLY think I missed the greatness in Belmont. I know, it was nice any tidy and nifty and everything. But 50% covered with grey path? well... I guess I am leaning towards fantasy right now
But, I'd imagine that out of the 40% that are interested, you're getting close to 100% participation. Seeing as this is a RCT fansite that people willingly come to, the "interest" is a given. So, the % of members able to vote that actually are voting could (should?) be higher.
The fact that this park is most definitely shooting for realism would kind of dictate the use of gray 'path', since the majority of seaside parks such as this truly do consist of vast amounts of asphalt/concrete with small areas of manicured landscaping interspersing the "traffic zones". For our teams sake, I'm just glad that you're in the minority that "missed" the greatness. As I watched this park develop, I knew we had something special going here and I'm happy that most voters seem to agree.
57 - some for us = about 53 ^^
Well... I can only speak for me, but I'm kind of disappointed of some of the trends so far. I would be able to understand it, if people from certain teams just weren't motivated to vote anymore.
We don't have many parks of this kind here in Germany, we usually have "themed-to-the-brim"-ones. As a matter of fact, this MIGHT be the reason for me not understanding the hype, because I'm just not familiar with this style of (rl)-park"making", it's just not as pleasing to me as a park that has been built to transport a message, to tell a story, not just to look "real".
I don't want to sound jaundiced here because you most certainly will win this round. I think you as a team did plan this matchup quite good, you got us on this one with the current trends within the community in mind.
Of course, my viewpoint is one that only 10 people can legally attain. Nonetheless, coming out now (preceding the last week of the 'regular season') with shit about not even being motivated to VOTE any longer is.....well, something only a child would think. "Takin' my ball and going home".
Oh yeah.....sometimes I forget the clientele here.
I'm truly sorry (for the immediate lack of a better term) that you have no small, beachside parks like this wherever you are. They're SO much fun to visit occasionally. The lack of ever experiencing something like this MIGHT influence one to not understand the real meaning of a "park". People that don't understand things tend to dismiss them. It's human nature. Not every "park" needs to tell a story or "transport a message". Some things are meant to just be enjoyed for what they are. And, this particular 'park' wasn't just some re-creation of an existing entity....there was a lot of thought and planning that went into making it a combination of something that IS there to be seen and something that we thought we'd LIKE to see.
And yeah, we will win this round (just like I predicted in Kumba's "Playoff Scenarios/Mid-Season Review" topic) and coast into the playoffs (BTW...I'd LOVE to think that any opponent in the playoffs thinks we've 'shot our wad' already...it's only gonna get better) while everyone else is battling to stay alive.
The one thing you have right is......we definitely planned out who would do what against who in what matchups. We obviously had no idea what individuals we'd be up against in any particular round, but....maybe we guessed right or.....maybe we're just THAT good. Either way....... We're 4-0 and you're not.
And, our team was assembled as it was because of our affliction within ourselves to create 'real' things. The same way Elementalists were assembled for their proclivity to do fantasy. It had NOTHING to do with any "trends". Gee just did one HELL of a job of getting the right people to do the job at hand. And, it shows.
You can be 'disappointed' in trends all you want but, they are what they are. Some people see trends and embrace them, others try to buck them to their own dismay.
That is so arrogant.
I do agree on Geewhzz having done a good job with choosing people but I wish you would be in a different team so that I wouldn't need to see any of your arrogance.
Another thing:
You, the one who probably starts the most discussions on this website out of all users, are one of the only users who doesn't seem to realize that different people can have different opinions. There is no right or wrong that everybody agrees on for things like rct.
Edited by Fisch, 12 June 2009 - 10:27 PM.
Green = me
Red = Fisch
Black = dlh
This is ABOUT it. No overboarding accuracy here ^^
At some place, we also just did what had to be done, so no area was made by just one person at all. Just showing the majorities.
Go buy a cake and celebrate it mate!
Well, I got them on the Whzz kids correct ... The Hurricanes not ...