Park / Draken

07-April 04

Park_4873 Draken

12 Comments

sloB Offline

Draken is a B&M Floorless coaster that submitted to be a NE Design. Unfortunately, it wasn't good enough to make the cut. It's a really simple design with a layout that I still really like. The problem is there wasn't really too much theming...okay, there is no theming. It's basically coaster, trees, and architecture.

Anyway, here is something for you guys to enjoy, but don't expect to be anything amazing.
Just a lil diddy.

Draken

Sorry about the large filesize guys. I used the PT Bench :/
posted 22 years ago
- #1
- Back to top
Brent Offline

How about a nice screen to compliment the file... but really because i don't have the game installed, and stuff.
posted 22 years ago
- #2
- Back to top
sloB Offline

Yeah Brent and anyone else who cares

Yeah....you know you love trees.
posted 22 years ago
- #3
- Back to top
Panoramical Offline

looks good nice landscaping (although there is a bare patch in there), and you could've used other flowers but i like everything else, and i like the coaster colours too
posted 22 years ago
- #4
- Back to top
posix Offline

I thought it was kind of nice. Very solid, with good colours and an okay track design. The architecture shows promise in my opinion.
Keep on improving and you'll rock, slob.
posted 22 years ago
- #5
- Back to top
Drew Offline

Is there a reason it was not submitted for an NE Design?

The coaster had a nice layout. It's a shame it wasn't submitted though. I bet it would have been one too...
posted 22 years ago
- #6
- Back to top
John Offline

Drew, it was submitted...
posted 22 years ago
- #7
- Back to top
deanosrs Offline

Very nice stuff. As you said, bit void in terms of themeing, but the layout was nice and the architecture was solid, if unadventurous. A good warm up for your PT entry....
posted 22 years ago
- #8
- Back to top
Steve Offline

Well.
The colors of the coaster were great. The classy, dark purple seems to be "in" now, so-to-speak. The architecture was fab and shows some talent, which, you obviously have. Nice work slob.

This acually seemed worthy of a place on the Designs page.
Maybe next time.
posted 22 years ago
- #9
- Back to top
Drew Offline

Drew, it was submitted...
Oh, heh, I missed that. I guess I should start paying closer attention when reading...
posted 22 years ago
- #10
- Back to top
Phatage Offline

I think I see why Iris didn't take this one slob. It really just felt un-inspired to me: the architecture, most of it being or stemming from a two x two block, was very repetitive and didn't seem like individual buildings were thought out. The coaster itself had many places that could've been smoothened out, and it just feels like it was the first draft of the coaster without any time taken to perfect the layout. Imo it was way overpaced in that it lacked major variation between speeds. Its fine to let a coaster go slower at the top of a loop, its more fun that way for most loops besides those great high-g schwartzkopf ones. I don't know, it just felt rushed and that you didn't really care about it, not like your pro designs which I liked much more than this; even if they are older.
posted 22 years ago
- #11
- Back to top
Kumba Offline

yeah its just littel nice, not design worthy tho... i could see a kinda strange RCT1 and 2x2 mix, but just to simaler.

layout 7/10
archy 6.5/10
landscapeing 4/10
treeing 4/10
theming 0.5/10

keep at it tho, just next time make sure you have a theme and ideas, this was very un-motivated.
posted 22 years ago
- #12
- Back to top
Panic Offline

That mid-ride corkscrew was insanely fast. Didn't really need it.
posted 22 years ago
- #13
- Back to top

Similar Parks

Members Reading