Park / 007 Adventure Park

19-June 03

Park_4351 007 Adventure Park

11 Comments

AustinPowers Offline

Me and Titan finished this park awhile ago in April and are finally releasing it for download....scroll down for the d/l site...

Here are some pics to refresh your memory..

The download is on our club site...scroll down to the 007 logo made by Glitchwolf that I resized

RCT Innovation
posted 22 years ago
- #1
- Back to top
TheGuardian Offline

that last pic looked a little weird the rest looked great. i loved the 1st and 2nd pics.
posted 22 years ago
- #2
- Back to top
Brent Offline

Well, I must say that this park was truely a letdown. From the screens over the park's construction phase, it looked great, and I couldn't wait for the download. But, like the old saying goes, never judge a book by its cover. That saying goes perfect with this park. Not one square interested me. The coasters were all under-par with layouts that really needed changed. Goldfinger went through the cobra roll straight out of the station, big no-no. It also had two cobra rolls... nice originality. Goldeneye was extremely slow through the elements as well. Triple X's layout was pretty off-the-shelf looking too. The rapids ride's layout was to yawn for, and the park was really lacking in the scenery department. Sorry but overall, this park (to me at least) gets a 4/10, and won't be kept on my computer.

-3
posted 22 years ago
- #3
- Back to top
Hevydevy Offline

Well, I must say that this park was truely a letdown. From the screens over the park's construction phase, it looked great, and I couldn't wait for the download. But, like the old saying goes, never judge a book by its cover. That saying goes perfect with this park. Not one square interested me. The coasters were all under-par with layouts that really needed changed....
Goldfinger went through the cobra roll straight out of the station, big no-no....
Goldeneye was extremely slow through the elements as well. The rapids ride's layout was to yawn for, and the park was really lacking in the scenery department.
I edited his post a little, but it said everything I needed to say, and I figured why type it out.

It looked so good from the pics. What went wrong?

,
Hevydevy
posted 22 years ago
- #4
- Back to top
Kumba Offline

Well, I must say that this park was truely a letdown. From the screens over the park's construction phase, it looked great, and I couldn't wait for the download. But, like the old saying goes, never judge a book by its cover. That saying goes perfect with this park. Not one square interested me. The coasters were all under-par with layouts that really needed changed. Goldfinger went through the cobra roll straight out of the station, big no-no. It also had two cobra rolls... nice originality. Goldeneye was extremely slow through the elements as well. Triple X's layout was pretty off-the-shelf looking too. The rapids ride's layout was to yawn for, and the park was really lacking in the scenery department. Sorry but overall, this park (to me at least) gets a 4/10, and won't be kept on my computer.

-3
impuls you know they got medicine to help you through your period. Any ways this park was good i like the details on the go karts and the fun house but i did not really like the rapids i just dont think the track should be above ground on that type of ride.

gets a 7 from me and for the record AP and Titan are much better parkmakers now
posted 22 years ago
- #5
- Back to top
John Offline

impuls you know they got medicine to help you through your period.
Does someone have a lack of originality? Your opinion (which yes, you are entitled to) is biased no matter what because you're in the same club as them.

I too thought this park was under-par. I completely detested the Intamin giga coaster, the drop was hideous, I just don't like using the elevator cable lifts anyway. But that's just me. I too would rate it at around a 4-4.5/10. Just not my cup of tea.
posted 22 years ago
- #6
- Back to top
Titan Offline

I think Kumba was a little light on us too... Well, I personally dont like it either... I didn't spend alot of time on it, and I treated it as a no-need-to-be-great park. I shouldn't have but I did.

However, I dont see how you can say all the coasters were horrible... I didn't plan them out like I usually do, but I still think that they are decent...
posted 22 years ago
- #7
- Back to top
penguinBOB Offline

The best thing in the park was triple-x, which has nothing to do with James Bond...

So yeah, this park gets a D- in my book. I can see talent, but it's not used correctly. Oh yeah, coasters were all too short ('cept XXX).
posted 22 years ago
- #8
- Back to top
AustinPowers Offline

Wow...I know it wasn't the best park...but I think all of you are being a bit harsh...it is over two months old...it was worked on mostly before that...

The first problem with the park is it wasn't big enough for what we tried to fit in there. So, the coasters aren't big enough and therefore not as good as they could have been.

Goldfinger, the Lim launch into a cobra roll out of the station...someone said..big no-no....
go tell that to everyone that likes FaceOff at PKI...
and two cobra rolls...what originality...
actually yeah...you cant say it wasnt original..lol...but I do get your point..

I don't see anything wrong with the rest of coasters...no..they aren't mind-blowing but they are decent...

The rapids ride was thrown in there as an afterthought and that shows...I didn't think the scenery was that bad..although I look at some of the buildings now...and cringe...

Triple X...btw...was the Russian agent that worked with Bond in The Spy Who Loved Me...so I dont know how you say the name had nothing to do with Bond...If you aren't a diehard fan..you probly lost a lot of the little things in that park...

But..hey...we move on...point made...point taken
posted 22 years ago
- #9
- Back to top
Brent Offline

Goldfinger, the Lim launch into a cobra roll out of the station...someone said..big no-no....
go tell that to everyone that likes FaceOff at PKI...
and two cobra rolls...what originality...
actually yeah...you cant say it wasnt original..lol...but I do get your point..
There's a difference between Goldfinger and Face-Off (and all the other boomerang coasters out there), Goldfinger's straight up launched out of the station, which wouldn't be so friendly on the back and head, compared to Face-Off where you have time to brace for it.

Anyways, I think you two are great parkmakers, and I know you guys can do better than this. It was too hyped up for what it really was, a park that shouldn't have been so hyped up.
posted 22 years ago
- #10
- Back to top
DragonInferno Offline

I must say I was very disappointed too. The screens looked great but the park was horrid IMO.
Just too plain.
69.63/100

~Dragon ~
posted 22 years ago
- #11
- Back to top
intamin101 Offline

There's a difference between Goldfinger and Face-Off (and all the other boomerang coasters out there), Goldfinger's straight up launched out of the station, which wouldn't be so friendly on the back and head, compared to Face-Off where you have time to brace for it.
Wow, some people really need to get out of RCT... I hate when people make retarded posts and think they know it all. I thought this was common knowlege...

http://www.rcdb.com/...4.htm?Picture=5

And Impuls3, don't bother responding. I probably wouldn't understand you with your foot so far down your throat
posted 22 years ago
- #12
- Back to top

Similar Parks

Members Reading