Park / Arid Heights

  • 17-February 18
Park_4040 Arid Heights

7 Comments

  • Comment System%s's Photo
    United Kingdom Comment System Offline
    comment below
    posted 7 years ago
  • Liampie%s's Photo
    Netherlands Liampie Offline
    I looked at this a little yesterday as I intended to approve it (which I failed to do), and the arrow hyper stood out to me. That layout looks great. Could be faster, but I expected it to be slower. The turnaround near the side-friction is one should could only pull off on an actual side friction, but other than that, good job.

    The logo may be the worst on the site, but in that regard it has a lot of added value. I enjoy it! :p
    posted 7 years ago
  • Iron Rattler%s's Photo
    Canada Iron Rattler Offline

    I agree with Liam in that the arrow was the highlight of the park to me. There were some other fun parts like the navajo area, which I thought was some unique NCSO. I didn't like how many trees there were though, it led to the park feeling cluttered in parts. Still, an early contender for Logo of the Year 2018

    posted 7 years ago
  • savoytruffle98%s's Photo
    United States savoytruffle98 Offline

    I'm heartbroken you feel that way about the logo. I pained over every pixel of it and quite frankly it's difficult to accept your criticism.

    Being serious now, thanks for your feedback and the (very) quick release. As a hilarious example of my poor taste in these things, Outlaw was (well, maybe still is) my least favorite coaster in the park. I was pretty close to scrapping it, so I'm glad I didn't. Kanawa Kountry was also kind of an afterthought, the last little bit that I did pretty quickly because I was running out of inspiration. Maybe from now on I should just keep the things I don't like and scrap the ones I do.

    I'd be much obliged if you kind downloaders could take a second and leave a rating (or even better, a comment) on this park, I'm very curious as to what the larger group opinion around here is.

    Be as negative as you please. I can take it.

    Except if it's about the logo.

    posted 7 years ago
  • CoasterCreator9%s's Photo
    United States CoasterCreator9 Offline

    This is a neat little park; it's cute and enjoyable. The coasters are unique and fun to watch, and a lot of the architecture, though simple, is charming. The foliage is a bit messy in general, creating a bit of a disorganized and cluttered feeling to the park.

     

    Overall, it's nice!

    posted 7 years ago
  • Lilith%s's Photo
    United States Lilith Offline

    i think the architecture is a little flat, its nice but not particularly interesting

     

    other than that its very cute and it was fun to explore. the foliage is odd but works well with your coaster layouts. i especially the landscaping beneath high noon, its pleasing to look at

     

    nice work!

     

    PS the logo is genuinely the most gorgeous park logo ive seen in my life

    posted 7 years ago
  • Cocoa%s's Photo
    Australia Cocoa Offline

    I thought this had a fun vibe and an interesting atmosphere. Its certaingly rough and maybe 'naive' would be the right word, in terms of rct-maturity and refinement. But there are nice bits, like the jumping fountain area near the purple buildings which comes together well. keep it up!

    posted 7 years ago
  • RWE%s's Photo
    Germany RWE Offline

    While some of this was pretty good and definitely nice to watch, i think all in all it's not quite up to what i would call accolade worthy. As others pointed out it also has a very unrefined feeling to it and some pretty messy and weird bits. But you're definitely having a unique style and i would love to see some more of it, i'm sure with some practise you can improve and your next submission will cross the accolade border! 45%.

    posted 7 years ago