Park / MegaLite [WORKING TITLE]

  • 10-October 12
Park_2500 MegaLite [WORKING TITLE]

9 Comments

  • Comment System%s's Photo
    United Kingdom Comment System Offline
    posted 12 years ago
  • Mattk48%s's Photo
    Canada Mattk48 Offline
    Whyyyyyyyyyyyyy. theres not much there but i really really love that layout
    posted 12 years ago
  • Goliath123%s's Photo
    Australia Goliath123 Offline
    ^ gonna call you out
    you cant question why its unfinished when you havent submitted anything. you obviously dont understand the concept of lack of time/motivation/rl whatever
    posted 12 years ago
  • Ling%s's Photo
    United States Ling Offline
    Isn't this the EXACT same layout as that Insomnia one he submitted like two days ago?
    posted 12 years ago
  • Pacificoaster%s's Photo
    United States Pacificoaster Offline
    Almost.
    posted 12 years ago
  • AvanineCommuter%s's Photo
    United States AvanineCommuter Offline
    I've brought this up in another thread before, but is it just me or does anyone else think that this layout would not be seen as "good" if Intimidator never existed? I like the layout a lot just like I liked Insomnia but I get the sneaking feeling that it's only praised because Intimidator set a precedent for this new type of layout to be viewed as acceptable, and if it hadn't been created then the creator of this type of coaster would be derided as not knowing what a good giga layout means. Or maybe I'm high. Or both?
    posted 12 years ago
  • RCT2day%s's Photo
    United States RCT2day Offline
    ^I totally agree. Without I305, or Skyrush to extend the metaphor, we would never build something like this, it's just absurdly tall and doesn't perform well in the game. It is one thing being innovative in the game (layouts, elements, etc.) but another in real life like engineers, where the latter is much more of an inspiration to us than the former do to the actual feasibility of something existing.
    posted 12 years ago
  • Midnight Aurora%s's Photo
    United States Midnight Aurora Offline
    I definitely had the same thought originally, Avanine. I think it's because visually there's a real lack of substance after the lift and the hill underneath it. I'd equate it to the layouts of the original mega coasters which were not much more than an out and back--works in real life, but looks like shit from the RCT view. Or one of those obnoxious rocket coasters like Top Thrill Dragster or Kingda Ka. You have to imagine riding it.

    That said, I'd ride the shit out of your coaster, Freak. I just don't want to look at it.
    posted 12 years ago
  • Mattk48%s's Photo
    Canada Mattk48 Offline

    ^ gonna call you out
    you cant question why its unfinished when you havent submitted anything. you obviously dont understand the concept of lack of time/motivation/rl whatever


    Point Taken.
    posted 12 years ago
  • MCI%s's Photo
    Germany MCI Offline

    I've brought this up in another thread before, but is it just me or does anyone else think that this layout would not be seen as "good" if Intimidator never existed? I like the layout a lot just like I liked Insomnia but I get the sneaking feeling that it's only praised because Intimidator set a precedent for this new type of layout to be viewed as acceptable, and if it hadn't been created then the creator of this type of coaster would be derided as not knowing what a good giga layout means. Or maybe I'm high. Or both?


    Same thing will happen now with zero-g-rolls on Wooden Rollercoasters...
    posted 12 years ago