Park / Skyline
-
16-July 12
- Views 12,697
- Downloads 687
- Fans 0
- Comments 72
-
-
65.38%(required: 65%) Design
chorkiel 75% Casimir 70% Roomie 70% turbin3 70% wheres_walto 70% CedarPoint6 65% geewhzz 65% Liampie 65% Maverix 65% Pacificoaster 65% Phatage 65% tyandor 65% posix 60% 5dave 55% BelgianGuy 50% 65.38% -
No fans of this park
-
Full-Size Map
-
Download Park
687
-
Objects
240
-
Tags
Similar Parks
-
Amusement Park
-
Amazon Falls
-
Baker Lake Amusement Park
-
Washington State Fair
-
Dimensions: Realms of Creation
-
Piraña
Agreed, it's one of the best logos by In:Cities.
ling, h8rz aside, this is fucking awesome. favourite design in a long time. the architecture is spot on. this style is the reason i joined new element.
And I love this design too btw Ling. It has a great feeling of nostalgia.
Scott.S Offline
The troll stuff on the logo is also great. Let's ignore the fact that somebody spent time on something and just taunt him on the fact that he's not getting credit for it. How mature.
Think this may fit better here now.
But seriously think about it, noone here knew that you made the logo so how did they know to credit you? And people are only trolling cos you're being a dick.
Scott.S Offline
The first time I was being a dick, I was doing it in jest to Ling. I did explain myself. I mentioned that I made the logo a while ago and it still hasn't been changed. I don't think anyone else would feel any differently about credit for something they worked on. I won't give some BS story about how my hard work is being falsely attributed (I think the entire thing took me 10 minutes), but credit is credit and it's kinda stupid not to change it, wouldn't you agree?
And yes, I'm going to be an asshole to "lol Ling your friend sucks". That pissed me off, I mean, come on. Who fucking says that? Does everything think I'm the only one being a dick? (And another edit, it just popped into my mind again: "Can somebody ban this fucking cunt". Again, I'm the only one being a dick?)
Edit: @Corkscrewy: He never claimed to design it, but the logo attribution still says "Logo by In:Cities". That is what I want changed. Cleaning up a logo is not the same as creating the design.
First of all, you weren't even a member of NE at the time Ling uploaded this park.
Second of all, your friend just got an accolade, is there really nothing better to do for you, than bitching about your Name in tiny letters on the top of the page? It's not like anybody will feel different about you.
For example: I join a community that doesn't know me ,doesn't know what i want or how i can behave. What would i do? Would it be smart to behave like you did ,without proper introduction or explanation before being rude or sarcastic.
I don't think so.
Scott.S Offline
Scott.S
Birthday: Unavailable
Age: Unavailable
Posts: 12 (0.11 per day)
Joined: 2012-04-04
___________________
Forget the logo. Whatever. It's obviously not going to be changed.
Ling, you know how I feel about the ride, and you know I was kidding about the bell-tower building. Love the architecture. The larger, more complex bridge is a beautiful piece of architecture. The waterfall fits in beautifully with the landscape and I think the foliage is extremely well done without being overdone, the whole "clumping" thing we talked about while you were designing really worked well. One thing I actually never noticed in the map was the little patio building just below the lodge, which I really really like now that I've noticed it.
The only thing that I think could have been done better is the layout (although I do understand that there is only so much you can do with suspended coasters). It seems somewhat dull and a little short, but perhaps that's just a consequence of the coaster type.
Either way, congrats on the second accolade in such a short time. Years of building on this forum and you're finally getting the recognition you deserve
Scott.S Offline
I understand. My apologies. Thank you for pointing this out to me.
Scott.S Offline
I quickly explained myself when people got pissed at my post, but nobody has bothered to take into account my explanation. Do you see why I'm frustrated as well?
Problem solved.
"MFG"
Apologies accepted. No hard feelings.
I'm sorry ,that i asked, if you could be banned, i might have been a little harsh.
I don't have a problem with sarcasm or f*cking around with each other sometimes, but explanation on forehand would have avoided all these issues.
But like i said before, no grudge.
Scott.S Offline
I'm new here. Didn't even know this was a thing.