Park / [H2H6] Hurricanes - Zombieland

09-May 12

Park_2372 [H2H6] Hurricanes - Zombieland

264 Comments

This park shares comments with 1 other park(View Park)

Sephiroth Offline

Vote = Zombieland
posted 13 years ago
- #121
- Back to top
Dr_Dude Offline

My vote goes to The Replacements.

Zombieland does make me want to build a studio that has some shred of accuracy, though.
posted 13 years ago
- #122
- Back to top
In:Cities Offline

Disappointed nobody mentioned Bill:[
posted 13 years ago
- #123
- Back to top
CoolCody Offline

This is why the vote codes were such a great thing last time around. You shouldn't be able to vote for a
park in H2H without seeing it in game.

+++ I agree, Also I believe not a lot of people actually dig deep in the parks and really get the whole atmosphere.

That being said, I have to post this screenshot, Its the most hilarious thing I've seen tonight.
posted 13 years ago
- #124
- Back to top
nin Offline

I appreciate the amount of "fuck nin"s in the Hurricanes' park.
posted 13 years ago
- #125
- Back to top
robbie92 Offline

"Fuck Nin" is the new "cat and monitor".
posted 13 years ago
- #126
- Back to top
In:Cities Offline

Nin you know I'm quite fond of you actually
posted 13 years ago
- #127
- Back to top
RMM Offline

i vote for neither.
posted 13 years ago
- #128
- Back to top
Liampie Offline

i vote for neither.

Because?
posted 13 years ago
- #129
- Back to top
K0NG Offline

I believe not a lot of people actually dig deep in the parks and really get the whole atmosphere.

Absolutely. In fact, I was really surprised at how quickly some of the votes came in...
which signifies just that. If everyone took the time to really go through both of
these, I believe the voting would be closer.

Man...this is fucking H2H6. Give these works of art the attention they deserve, people!
Some of you have no idea how much thought and work goes into these creations in a very limited amount of time.
posted 13 years ago
- #130
- Back to top
Pacificoaster Offline

I may have established my vote quickly, but I stand by it all the way.

Zombieland: The park was pretty lifeless to me. The implementation of the "zombies" were neat but were just too static and repetitive. The studio backlot was good and probably held my attention the most. What killed it for me was the abundant use of gray tarmac, the redundant architecture that was created using corrugated roofs and white blocks, and the mediocre coaster layouts aside from Zombie Hunt which felt a bit forced for the space in my opinion.

Sea of Sagas: This park struck me initially as architecturally aesthetic. The Hanse Port was great and held my attention for a good portion of time. I especially enjoyed the "Mutiny on the Baltic" show. I loved the facades along the structure for Stortebeker's Crew. I thought Fafnir was great. Sure the foliage could have been done better to establish a greater mountainous theme but the coaster layout was awesome. I love how the last turn of the coaster embodies a burning village and added to the theme of a fire breathing dragon. Lastly, I enjoyed the way the Octopus enveloped the shipwreck for the drop on Voyage to Vinland.
posted 13 years ago
- #131
- Back to top
Fisch Offline

first vote came in 35 minutes after this was posted. Considering when Posix posted there instantly were like 10 people in this topic 35 minutes is not exactly short.
posted 13 years ago
- #132
- Back to top
Turtle Offline

Vote - Sea of Sagas.
posted 13 years ago
- #133
- Back to top
AvanineCommuter Offline

Just remember that the majority of voting probably comes from personal bias based on what type of parkmaking the voter enjoys more... realism, semi, fantasy, etc. A realistic builder would enjoy a well made realistic park much more than a well made fantasy park, no? Since both of these parks, IMO, were of similar quality but of different styles, it came down more to "which park grabbed my attention and kept it", which for me was the more fantastical entry. As I claimed in my review, Zombieland is a great park indeed, but as it isn't "my cup of tea", it would need to be up against a park of lower quality to get my vote, and this time it wasn't.
posted 13 years ago
- #134
- Back to top
SupraSix Offline

The way I vote for parks... I try and figure out the ideas/motivations behind each park and then grade them on how that "idea" was executed. Actually since I have more experience in realism I'm more likely to catch more flaws in a realistic park over a fantasy park just because I have a more critical eye when it comes to realism. For zombieland it was pretty straight forward, realistic park/movie set + zombies. The movie set and zombies were awesome and besides it getting a little repetitive there was really no problems. But in terms of a realistic park it didn't score as high. Sea of Sagas had a little more diversity in ideas and for me overall it was executed better. I've found that this way of judging mostly eliminates bias and forces me to really think though parks individually instead of one style vs. another. Anyways just thought I'd throw this in since people are discussing the "right" and fare way to evaluate parks, especially when it comes to H2H.
posted 13 years ago
- #135
- Back to top
Louis! Offline

From the overviews they look fantastic. I'm excited to actually open these up in game, they both look incredible.
posted 13 years ago
- #136
- Back to top
trav Offline

Absolutely. In fact, I was really surprised at how quickly some of the votes came in...
which signifies just that. If everyone took the time to really go through both of
these, I believe the voting would be closer.

Man...this is fucking H2H6. Give these works of art the attention they deserve, people!
Some of you have no idea how much thought and work goes into these creations in a very limited amount of time.

See this is what I hate. How do you know that people haven't looked around the park for as long as they need to to gain a good insight into the parks? I know I spent a good half an hour looking at the Hurricanes park and I just wasn't impressed by the repetitive details, ugly architecture and stale atmosphere.

Just because someone disagrees with you does not make them wrong, get over yourself. And that's to all the people who are butthurt because Replacements are winning. You're not better than the rest of the people who were voting, you do not know any better than them. Jeez.
posted 13 years ago
- #137
- Back to top
Six Frags Offline

See this is what I hate. How do you know that people haven't looked around the park for as long as they need to to gain a good insight into the parks? I know I spent a good half an hour looking at the Hurricanes park and I just wasn't impressed by the repetitive details, ugly architecture and stale atmosphere.

Just because someone disagrees with you does not make them wrong, get over yourself. And that's to all the people who are butthurt because Replacements are winning. You're not better than the rest of the people who were voting, you do not know any better than them. Jeez.
Let the bitchfighting commence!
posted 13 years ago
- #138
- Back to top
trav Offline

I'm not bitchfighting, I just don't see why people have to shit on other people's opinions?
posted 13 years ago
- #139
- Back to top
Ruben Offline

Thanks for saying it trav.

KONG: Not everyone is like you. Really. Might be hard but it is so. After looking into both parks for a fair 10 mins each my first impression hadn't changed. Logical, because whether it's food, clothing or H2H6 parks I'm always very sure about what I do and don't like instantly. Digging more into something hardly ever changes that. I could have waited with posting my vote for an hour, but it wouldn't have made a difference 'cause I made up my mind. Just like some people need but 2 mins to know which one they prefer, and others need to look into it for an hour each, and recheck it the day after. Is it so hard to understand/respect that?

Not everybody's KONG/KONGclone. Just saying.
posted 13 years ago
- #140
- Back to top