Park / PineHills Orlando

  • 25-April 12
Park_2346 PineHills Orlando

66 Comments

  • Comment System%s's Photo
    United Kingdom Comment System Offline
    posted 13 years ago
  • MikaRCT2%s's Photo
    Netherlands MikaRCT2 Offline
    FINALLY RELEASED!
    I was looking in your topic and I was waiting for it to be released finally! I think Gold is fitting good for this park ;) I quite enjoyed it!
    I'm looking forward to your next release!

    EDIT: I got an ET after a while :'( is that just me or does everyone have that?
    posted 13 years ago
  • pashearer23%s's Photo
    United States pashearer23 Offline
    Been waiting on this for weeks! Congrats on the Gold!
    posted 13 years ago
  • RCTER2%s's Photo
    RCTER2 Offline
    A realistic style park!
    posted 13 years ago
  • AvanineCommuter%s's Photo
    United States AvanineCommuter Offline
    Looks great from the overview, but it does seem a tad too gray. Will check it out later! Congrats on gold!!
    posted 13 years ago
  • Ruben%s's Photo
    Netherlands Ruben Offline
    I really like this, especially the rapid river and the custom kiddie rides. However I feel like it was just a bit too cramped at times, resulting in you not allowing yourself the space needed (for example for the playground in the back of the park, or for the launched coaster).

    Overall a very good park, but it could have been just a tad better if you'd given the park some more rustique spots to diversify.
    posted 13 years ago
  • Hex%s's Photo
    United States Hex Offline
    Thought the layouts were amazing for their size. Congrats!
    posted 13 years ago
  • 111112oo%s's Photo
    Australia 111112oo Offline
    This is awsome.
    posted 13 years ago
  • prodigy%s's Photo
    Germany prodigy Offline
    Great park, congratz, well deserved!!!
    posted 13 years ago
  • turbin3%s's Photo
    Korea, Republic of turbin3 Offline
    I don't get all this hype about the park. Yes, it's good, but 100%? 60-65% in my eyes.

    Congrats on the accolade though, looking forward to your next parks/designs :)
    posted 13 years ago
  • posix%s's Photo
    Germany posix Offline
    I'm impressed you finished this over such a long period of time. It shows you had real dedication for this project which is nice. I understand that with this detailistic style larger parks are not feasible, so in comparison to the rare parks in this style that do make it to a release this was relatively large- well done.

    Your details are all pretty clear and I felt this added to the pakr a lot as everything was easily identifiable. However, I also felt as though you had pretty redundant details everywhere. Such as the fine terrain colour variations that I would deem totally irrelevant and unnecessary. It gives rise to my typical gripe with this style that everything becomes too "made" and can no longer be organic at all. I also agree with the criticism others already mentioned that it felt too cramped. The park layout was pretty strange. I think it would help if you did more planning and layout work before you start your next project.

    I would also like to see you do an actual theme. Replicating amusement parks is nice, but it's pretty void of any kind of imaginativeness, which makes everything less interesting I find.
    posted 13 years ago
  • K0NG%s's Photo
    United States K0NG Offline

    I don't get all this hype about the park.


    That's the thing. IMO there was more hype than substance here. No offense to gijssie1234 in
    that regard because this was pretty good. It was just not Gold quality in my opinion.

    What was there was extremely well done, although it seemed like I was looking at something nin
    built in most places. Also, as has been mentioned...it did indeed feel very cramped (which I
    think can be partially attributed to the way it was cut off so closely) and poorly designed/planned.

    I didn't get a chance to vote on this, so I haven't really gone over it thoroughly. That being said,
    I'd probably have given this between 65-75 tops.

    Congrats on the accolade though. I hope you take these criticisms into account for your next project
    as I think you could really benefit from what's been said.
    posted 13 years ago
  • gijssie1234%s's Photo
    Netherlands gijssie1234 Offline
    thanks all!!! i'm really glad that i finish this park, also my next park will be high detail, even better!!!, and the park feeling + size will be bigger!! see you the next time, sorry i don't wright that much ;) i'm not a good storyteller xD
    posted 13 years ago
  • dr dirt%s's Photo
    United States dr dirt Offline
    everything's so tiny.. i feel like it should have had at least one large scale ride. not even the tower rides are full size.
    posted 13 years ago
  • Wanted%s's Photo
    United States Wanted Offline
    100% ? lol wut

    Edit - Anyway, love this small scale style. One of my favorite parks from H2H5, Calypso Quay, had similar small scale architecture in it.
    posted 13 years ago
  • Fizzix%s's Photo
    United States Fizzix Offline
    This was very good aside from layout( a few too many dead-ends) and cropping too close. This shows that you are a committed player, and can finish a park solo of a high quality. I think this would be a solid-high Silver, but not a Gold. Overall, very good job, a well deserved accolade. Next time, let's see some theme and a larger park! :p
    posted 13 years ago
  • Dr_Dude%s's Photo
    United States Dr_Dude Offline
    As far as I'm concerned this is the best realistic park in history (not counting LL).
    posted 13 years ago
  • Wanted%s's Photo
    United States Wanted Offline
    Belmont Shores? :???:
    posted 13 years ago
  • robbie92%s's Photo
    United Kingdom robbie92 Offline
    Although 70 in general is usually a high score, from me, I meant it to be fairly low. I didn't enjoy this nearly as much as I hoped I would. The boomerang was the best layout in the park, which is never a good sign. I don't know, I just feel that anyone calling this the greatest realism park of all time or giving this 100 doesn't quite get the workings of realism, or is just singularly focused on the details while avoiding more important factors like park layout, composition, coaster layouts, and atmosphere. Your later screens have all showed a better understanding of this, so I'm not too worried, but this park just didn't quite do it for. It just felt very superficial.
    posted 13 years ago
  • pierrot%s's Photo
    Korea, Republic of pierrot Offline
    Louis?

    I think foliage is executed pretty poor. the color, type of foliage..witch makes extreamly lifeless.
    Really love every single details in this park though.
    posted 13 years ago