Park / Out of Space, Planet of the Battles

10-October 11

Park_2072 Out of Space, Planet of the Battles

63 Comments

Flap Offline

Well Actually it was 1 of the 4 parts of a park; And that's why it was mentioned as design

But the other 3 parts are never going to be released cause i don't fucking build the concept arts i've made earlier in my head anymore.
posted 13 years ago
- #21
- Back to top
Liampie Offline

So yeah, here's why I voted 20%.

- I didn't like the coasters. They weren't awful, but I just didn't like the layouts and the pacing and stuff. Also I think they didn't duel well and the colours were ugly and random. It totally didn't fit in its surroundings, there weren't any cool interactions at all. No thought went into them.
- Foliage was ugly and filler.
- Architecture was ugly and random.
- Everything was really ugly. The colours were random and looked bad together. Yellow and orange represent radioactive materials? Makes perfect sense. It could as well represent child abuse in eastern Peru or extra fluffy Mickey Mouse boots. The composition was unbalanced and again it seems no thought went into this, or you just have no sense of aesthetics. I presume it's a combination of both.
- Nothing made sense. What is it I'm looking at? Is it a space station? With trees? Is it a 'space planet'? A 'space planet', yet out of space? Where are the battles? Why are there trees on a space station? The naming was besides the incorrect grammar stuff totally random too: Sound Control of Noise, The Virus of Orange Evil, Saw of the Technical Arts, The Office of Futured Madness, X-MayDay Falls, Enterprise Of the Zero G-Force and don't forget the main rides in the park/design/space planet/out of space station, Looping Faithless and Unlooping Faithless. What the fuck? I tried to understand your work but I remain clueless.

It's not because you're 'so different and special' that you got a low score. The (lack of?) ideas and the execution are just really poor.

there is something like panel lists politics
Spot on.

so I went a little bit higher with my vote than normal in the hope to compensate for some lower vote. but I must admit I actually tought this would score round the 60%.
Levis, I don't think that's how a panelist should vote. Now you're voting higher to make your own vote weigh more.
posted 13 years ago
- #22
- Back to top
turbin3 Offline

I don't care if it made sense or not, I enjoyed it.
posted 13 years ago
- #23
- Back to top
zburns999 Offline

^I agree with turbin3. It was weird as hell, but I can't say I didn't enjoy watching it. I thought the coasters had some fun duels, the support work was great, the large loop on the invert was awesome, and the architecture was really unique. Very nice submission. I enjoyed it quite a bit and would have scored it around a 60% or so. Keep up the good work, man.
posted 13 years ago
- #24
- Back to top
Super G Offline

Why the heck did Thomahawk got a design, and this not. The Lay-outs are both awesome, but the theming here is much better then in Thomahawk... I'm thinking more and more that the Panalist only is voting high at persons they like, and persons they don't like got only low votes. And you deffinately see that the pannellist only looks to personal likings, and not at technical skills.
posted 13 years ago
- #25
- Back to top
turbin3 Offline

Technical skills in Tomahawk were much higher imo.
posted 13 years ago
- #26
- Back to top
trav Offline

Oh shut the fuck up. It didn't win design cos it was ugly as fuck with it's colours, the architecture was so blocky and basic that you just threw on everything you could to make it look detailed rather than actually building the details into the buildings, the foliage was absolutely awful, the landscaping was pretty tragic, and it just wasn't worth design.

The coaster supports and layout were pretty decent, but really, just take a step back and look at the rest of the park, it was awful.

Sorry to be so blunt about it, but when people start moaning and crying corruption, it pisses me off.
posted 13 years ago
- #27
- Back to top
Liampie Offline

Me too.
posted 13 years ago
- #28
- Back to top
Super G Offline

I'm sorry being blunt, I maybe could use more friendly words the next time...
posted 13 years ago
- #29
- Back to top
Flap Offline

Well if something is meant to be This architecture, oh well...

And i also don't believe anymore in the pannelist after seeing what they vote this days on some submissions. even if there is a politics for the pannels...

Not saying mine was that good, but as i see some from others and what designs get a whin and which not i give up my trusts in the pannel, i'm sorry.

@Louis or a other administrator, Still don't want any points for my submissions from now. just forget it, i play for the fun
posted 13 years ago
- #30
- Back to top
robbie92 Offline

Oh, shut up about these "panel politics." I vote for what I find visually appealing and what interests me longer that the duration of the ride. Your design wasn't good looking and there was nothing beyond the layouts that was remotely interesting to me. Windsweep and Tomahawk both had good layouts, plus good foliage, good architecture, and excellent atmosphere. Your's had none of that. Read Liampie's comment for a better explanation. So, no, I didn't vote down this design because of politics, I just voted it down because I didn't like it.
posted 13 years ago
- #31
- Back to top
BelgianGuy Offline

I completely agree with robbie, I don't believe in panel politics tbh,

I mean come on! I've been panelist for over a year and I have 4accolades, I did get some near misses, some closer than others but I never blamed it on the panel I mean, you're sending it in to be judged by people who WILL have an opnion and you'll have to live with the fact some people have other opinions about your work, some will think it's worth of design, some won't, that's the system you submitted it to so don't come bitxhing about it afterwards because it didn't win...
posted 13 years ago
- #32
- Back to top
wildroller Offline

Flap, you do have good ideas here but you put them together in some sort of weird way that really doesn't work. Instead of blaming the panelists for this not getting a design, listen to what the panel has to say about what needed improvement.

And to be quite honest the red/blue with white supports doesn't look appealing to me at all, the colors of the whole design clash quite bad.

It's a good start and if you actually listen to what people are saying you need to improve on, you will get an accolade.
posted 13 years ago
- #33
- Back to top
5dave Offline

Didn't you know? You have to bribe the panel to get an accolade.
This is serious business.

But seriously. I vote what I think is fitting for a park and it worked out 325 times before without anyone complaining.

"MFG"
posted 13 years ago
- #34
- Back to top
gir Offline

All of this "politics" stuff is stupid. And Levis, I know the panel has no set criteria for voting, but skewing the vote on purpose is simply not fair and if you believe in this "political" nonsense, then I don't see how that makes it any better.

For those of you who don't know why this didn't make design, have a look at past designs and compare the quality of them. If you still think it's the same as something like Tomahawk, you need to take a step back and really examine the two.
posted 13 years ago
- #35
- Back to top
ScOtLaNdS_FiNeSt Offline

I like the coasters, But im not really sure about everything else. As far as people voting badly because they dont really like you or whatever that's nonsense, Getting a design/accolade is a special thing and if the judges weren't critical then everyone would have accolades. Flap i think you should build the other parks you were going to build because you should know now what was lacking in this design, If you have been reading what the panel have been saying, Who knows you might get an accolade next time, But don't just give up because you didnt win this time keep on fighting
posted 13 years ago
- #36
- Back to top
Flap Offline

well i can renember me fighting with Liampie a few years ago even before i was member here...

But i can deal with it guy's come on, there is voted and i enjoyed it to create it
posted 13 years ago
- #37
- Back to top
Liampie Offline

well i can renember me fighting with Liampie a few years ago even before i was member here...

Where? And who are you? I rarely have fights.
posted 13 years ago
- #38
- Back to top
ScOtLaNdS_FiNeSt Offline

By "Keep on fighting" i meen Flap keep building. Just to clarify
posted 13 years ago
- #39
- Back to top
Midnight Aurora Offline

Let's set aside our panel politics aside and come together bipartisan unity to bring back rct2isboss. He is the sun that breathes life into this lowly website. We... I... am lost without him.
posted 13 years ago
- #40
- Back to top