Park / Kraken
- 22-July 11
- Views 4,117
- Downloads 489
- Fans 0
- Comments 26
-
56.92%(required: 65%)
Design Submission
BelgianGuy 65% tyandor 65% Casimir 60% inVersed 60% JDP 60% Metropole 60% That Guy 60% turbin3 60% wheres_walto 60% Liampie 55% robbie92 55% prodigy 50% RMM 50% nin 45% K0NG 10% 56.92% - No fans of this park
- Download Park 489
- Objects 275
- Tags
26 Comments
Comment System Offline
That Guy Offline
Now, one thing that REALLY killed the viewing were the peeps, as soon as the park is opened, they're already jammed, the park rating is already 0, everything is already hell...not to mention the constant messages about the fuckers being unhappy. It honestly would've been better with no peeps at all.
tdub96 Offline
But K0NG, its not really that bad....is it? I didn't think so...now obviously, rating it any higher still wouldn't have helped its chances at winning...
K0NG Offline
Edit: Ok, there must have been a glitch in the system or something because, while I think this was a generic, toss-it-out-and-hope-for-another-accolade effort from Mav, there's no way I would have given this a 10. Hell, I'd have given it at least 20 just for putting 25 game years into it. Looking at it just now, I'm thinking 45. And no MA, I wasn't drunk...I never even open an accolade submission unless I'm 100% sober, let alone vote on it.
Whatever the reason for that showing as a 10...thankfully, the high and low votes get tossed so it had no effect on the final tally. This wasn't terrible...it just wasn't very good.
Edit#2: And since I saw posix post before I finished editing mine...I guaranfuckingtee you that I didn't intentionally give this a 10, and I'm pretty fucking pissed that you'd post a 'from on-high, holier-than-thou' comment like that dissing me for what is obviously some kind of, in your own words, "terrible mistake". And no tongue-in-cheek here (my adrenaline is seriously flowing hard just from reading that bullshit)....admin or not, use some fucking common sense before you post shit like that man
Edit#3: Particularly since you'd already seen me say that I had to take another look at the fucking thing because I obviously couldn't understand why I'd give it a 10 myself. Jesus Fucking Christ...think, man.
Jaguar Offline
posix Offline
K0NG Offline
Anyway, as much as I enjoy being a part of the accolade process and voting on submissions, I think whoever is in charge might as well just fucking remove me from the fucking panel.
Thanks, posix...you're quite a guy.
zburns999 Offline
And as for KONG'S 10 vote: whether it was a mistake or not, there have been some really questionable votes on parks before. This would not be the most outrageous thing I've ever seen. It's not that big of a deal either way.
wildroller Offline
As for Kong's 10 vote, I think anyone who's been on this site for a while should know there's no way he'd do that intentionally, probably not even if he were really drunk and in a bad mood I don't think he'd do that. And it would be one hell of a loss to lose Kong on the accolade panel over an obvious misvote.
Comet Offline
The major problem with this was the lack of interaction with the midway. The peeps couldn't see the actual Kraken mouth or the splash down from anywhere but the ride, and could barely see the first drop. If you've ever been to either Busch Gardens with SheiKra and Griffon, and possibly even Oblivion, one very noticable thing is that not only are dive machines fun rides, but they transform the area they're in. Here you just have a straight midway with the coaster off to the side and no path or anything underneath it
Overall I would have given this about a 63
Flap Offline
Also im suprised this was not getting through the pannelist as a design, maybey KONG's mistake is involved.
An Accident is made easier than you think!
So KONG, don't be pissed, Were al human, i said thet before, Renember?
We all make mistakes!
Louis! Offline
Why would it be questioned because you've been called out once?
If you really want to be removed from the process then PM me and I'll have you removed, if not I'll leave you as you are.
Comet Offline
One thing that I have noticed with voting is that after somebody wins their first accolade the panelists seem to hold that person to a much higher standard, this isn't necessarily a bad thing. For instance I think this is much better than Hammerhead but Maverix is being held to a higher standard now
Flap Offline
I'm sorry than, but then i really don't understand why everyone is so upset to KONG?
It's a mistake and mistakes can happen!
Maverix Offline
inVersed Offline
On to the design... I really didnt care for it much, mainly for reasons stated already.
Twistacular Offline
K0NG Offline
Of course I don't really want to leave the panel...I just don't want anyone that submits anything to have anything but 100% faith in my judgement. And, my judgement...along with my credibility as an accolade panelist has been called into question here. That bothers me. As I'm sure it would anyone else put in this situation.
But, it's all good. Whatever faith in me that certain admin seem to lack is countered by the faith that I'm sure, by reading the replies here, that the majority of members here retain.
And Mav...sorry to fuck your thread up here with all of this bullshit. I didn't give it a 10. Trust me.
posix Offline
Austin55 Offline
Sadly, that was about all I liked about this. The rest wasnt bad. Just Mehh. The Architecture was nice, but suffered from the Belgianguy Syndrome of being somewhat useless, or you dont know what the buildings are for. There just sortofff random. And the splashdown, it should be where guests can see it and go ohh ahh, but no it was on a hill, not clearly visible or enticing. Think Busch Gardens or Manta.
Edit-actually, the ship was cool. But we just saw that in Steel.
I think though that you have loads of potential though. I like your parks more than your Designs...
I cant wait to see what you do next but hope you spend more time on it and make it more original.