Park / Turbo Rush Park

28 Comments PARK LOCKED

  • Comment System%s's Photo
  • CoolCody%s's Photo
    Oh and we thought you couldn't get lower then the 2% you scored on your last park!

    Posted Image

    bravo!
  • F0ndue%s's Photo
    Well,at least the name fits:
    the park is rushed.
  • Liampie%s's Photo
    I can't really remember voting for this park. :rolleyes:
  • F0ndue%s's Photo
    Well,maybe you were drunk,what ever at least you voted
    "Im Sinne der Allgemeinheit" in german said.
  • MCI%s's Photo
    Go out, ride rollercoasters, have fun and at least: Come back and show them that you´re able to build a good layout.
  • Roomie%s's Photo
    Wow. I must have been drunk to vote 15.

    Anyway as said coaster design here is shocking. For example very very few coasters have curved Lift hills. A few travelling schwartzkopf's and Delphi in Japan spring to mind but in general that is a massive no in RCT. On top of that the excessive use of the lift hills themselves is poor. A good coaster uses the momentum it gets from one lift to maximum effect. Very few real rides have multiple lifts. The exceptions generally being Vekoma mine trains and Arrow suspended coaster.
  • musicman%s's Photo
    Ro-failetor?
  • wildroller%s's Photo
    well at least he got .77 points for the effort he put into this park, sure is going to boost up his hall of fame ranking!
  • chorkiel%s's Photo
    I think he wasn't a serious player AT ALL.
  • Chillsons%s's Photo
    Why submit this for a accolade?

    But just keep building and you will keep getting better! (I hope)
    As Roomie said just work on your layouts.
  • prodigy%s's Photo
    When I saw this first, I didn't want to vote on it. But it stayed in my job-section for over a week, I think, so finaly I voted on it. Then I thought about doin a fun-vote with 100%-spotlight, to show my massiv antipathy against such send-ins in an ironic way. I didn't do cause I don't know how the admins would think about it, but next time I have to think a bit longer about it...
  • Liampie%s's Photo
    In all honesty I don't think BrianD will recognize it as a sarcasm vote. Don't bother...
  • Jaguar%s's Photo
    ^I can see him commenting:

    "Thank u Prodigy for kind vote I new this would be accolade."
  • MeMeMe%s's Photo
    BrianD, a couple pieces of advice:
    1. Don't submit anything of this type for an accolade when it's about the same skill, if less, than your previous submissions.
    2. Advertise, and don't rush your park. Get feedback from the Dump-Place or your own topic, then use it to your advantage.
    3. Most of the time, it's a good idea to NOT build violent death machines as your design submissions.
  • Chillsons%s's Photo

    3. Most of the time, it's a good idea to NOT build violent death machines as your design submissions.

    Haha
  • rct2isboss%s's Photo
    guya lets try to point out the good things he did like a section of a pathway that was doubled path good job.
  • Dotrobot%s's Photo
    ^holy shit

    not even.
  • Louis!%s's Photo
    Wow, you know it's a sad site when something like this recieves more comments than a park that has actually won an acolade.

    Perhaps it would be great if NE put more effort into commenting on the decent stuff rather than the crap.
  • CoolCody%s's Photo

    Wow, you know it's a sad site when something like this recieves more comments than a park that has actually won an acolade.

    Perhaps it would be great if NE put more effort into commenting on the decent stuff rather than the crap.


    I have a feeling most people don't comment on accolade parks because they feel like if they do make a comment but someone sees they haven't won any awards they might not be taken serious or even trolled for making a comment or an opinion, that's just my insight into it.