Park / DisneySea
- 30-July 08
- Views 16,616
- Downloads 4,211
- Fans 3
- Comments 55
-
83.13%(required: none) Spotlight
Cocoa 90% no 5dave 85% no Arjan v l 85% no BelgianGuy 85% no MCI 85% no ][ntamin22 85% no geewhzz 80% no Liampie 80% no Louis! 80% no nin 75% no 83.13% 0.00% - 3 fans Fans of this park
- Full-Size Map
- Download Park 4,211
- Tags
55 Comments
Highball Offline
JJ Offline
Gwazi Offline
Kevin Enns Offline
JJ Offline
Kevin Enns Offline
trav Offline
This park, whilst absolutely brilliant and one of my favourite spotlights ever, doesn't quite capture the essence of the real one. I know it's rct, so it's limited, but to me, there weren't enough details in parts. Yes, the buildings were nice, and looked very similar to their real life counterparts, but it didn't have them little quirks that I found in the real park.
Although, if I just look at the park as though I haven't been, it is fantastic. There are a few areas I don't like, such as the Scandanavian bit, but I could still see the skill shining through. The submarine was fantastic, and the entrance area was superb. The only thing I would suggest is put a little more closer down to the paths. If I remember correctly, there wasn't much down near the actual paths, which is what the RCT peeps would see. They wouldn't see right to the top of these buildings unless they were stood at the opposite end of the park.
But yeah, easily my favourite spotlight since Turtle's last park.
Highball Offline
trav Offline
When I manage to scan my photos in, I'll send them your way.
Highball Offline
Lotte Offline
when did it get that score?
csw Offline
Um...I assume recently, as it was a spotlight before the accolade panel.
We don't need to comment on every park getting updated scores saying, "when did this get a score?!" though.
Lotte Offline
csw what i think made this interesting is that it has a 100% no on spotlight
csw Offline
Understandable. But I meant mostly for other parks that will receive scores in the future.
Liampie Offline
I don't think we can select yes/no when voting on old accolades, apparantly no is the default. But more importantly, as requested before, please stop asking these annoying fucking questions. Bumping old parks with relevant opinions and obsverations is perfectly fine, but not with the faecal matter you just posted.
Xeccah Offline
i posted mine because i simply didn't realize until then, but now i understand the system
it's glad to see a park which doesn't follow the modern conventions of aestethics and general composition still stand the test of time. highball's new park is going to blow this outta the fucking water, though.