Park / North of the Border
-
28-December 10
- Views 6,661
- Downloads 1,200
- Fans 4
- Comments 32
-
-
51.54%(required: 50%)
Bronze
Kumba 75% Louis! 75% Wicksteed 70% Liampie 65% Levis 60% 5dave 55% Casimir 55% CedarPoint6 55% turbin3 55% Maverix 40% prodigy 40% RCTNW 40% BelgianGuy 30% K0NG 30% dmaxsba 20% 51.54% -
4 fans
Fans of this park
-
Full-Size Map
-
Download Park 1,200
-
Objects 241
-
Tags
As for the park. It definetely looks like Butterfinger architecture. The trees kinda overtake this so I definetely like his older parks better.
I never said that, I just explained that most old spotlights cannot compete with newer ones. They are beautiful, but outdated. I never said they were worse, and I said that most spotlights from the past would get lower scores not that they were worse.
Please don't assume. I was not saying anything about that, and for you to post that rude comment. I am not going to get into an arguement because someone was to ignorant and misinterpreted what I have said, so don't tell me what to do or not to do.
You are wrong. Every system has its flaws, because people are human, and progress advances over time. Basically the older spotlights are "antiques" in a way.
I also agree however with your point that saying "they cannot compete" equals saying "they are worse", which is why I would ask you, Jag, in what regard, subjectively for you, they cannot compete?
Again, this irritating unspoken assumption that more detail equals better parkmaking quality emerges for me here.
What I have observed over the past year is that the level of detail has been increased to produce ever finer building fronts or foliage design. Yet I don't feel higher park quality goes hand in hand with this. In fact, I believe it often enough reduces park quality, as focus on flowing path layout, ride alignment or harmony of colour is compensated or lost completely.
But I am glad you see what I mean.
tdub96 Offline