Park / Aero's Wormwood

72 Comments

  • G-Rocks%s's Photo

    Wormwood is my fav rct2 park so far.

    Gotta agree here.

    Great work, Aero. Awesome effort put into this thing. You've kinda renewed my interest in RCT2.
  • Coaster Ed%s's Photo
    I don't know where to get it anymore, but aero21 made a recreation of Paramount's Great America in RCT2 last year that was terrific. Lots of great theming ideas there too. If you can find that and you liked Wormwood, definately check it out.
  • spiderman%s's Photo
    Judging from the screens, I expected one of the weakest sptlights, but I was very wrong! The entrance is just gorgeous! So realistic and still looks very good, such a great entrance. All the other sections are just great, such as the stand-up is a good coaster (forgot name). The one thing I didnt like was that architecture seemed kinda blocky in the western area, but the woodies there were great.

    Good spotlight :)
  • thorpedo%s's Photo
    No offense to Aero or anything....but I hated all of his recent works...until this. Wow.

    I love this thing. Its so perfect in everyway, and its beautifully designed to Aero's style. Great archy, terrific theming...this park has it all. Congrats to Aero on this one, its a doozy.


    Psstt...what happened to Outrage's runnerups? I was a little confused when I came on here and there was another spotlight, but no runnerups from before. ?
  • iris%s's Photo
    Runner-Ups are bi-spotlight. So Outrage didn't have them, but this one will.
  • thorpedo%s's Photo
    ^Ah. That makes sense.
  • Turtleman%s's Photo
    Holy Shit!!!! I just noticed something. Those "fans" near The Flying Dutchman are awesome! Good thinking with the mechanical gears!

    Turtleman 8)
  • Scarface%s's Photo

    Holy Shit!!!! I just noticed something. Those "fans" near The Flying Dutchman are awesome!

    Turtleman 8)

    do u mean the windmill ?
    if so i forgot to say the windmill was nice !!
  • Coaster Ed%s's Photo
    No I think he means the airflow fans that are part of the building. I agree, that was a very cool detail.
  • Scarface%s's Photo

    No I think he means the airflow fans that are part of the building. I agree, that was a very cool detail.

    oh ill have to check them now !! ;) thanx
  • Butterfinger%s's Photo
    Hmmm...... sorry Aero, but I'm gonna have to agree with Beta here.


    I did not like this park either. The one single thing it lacked was........... ummm, everything. In my eyes at least. I was actually rather expectant of this park. I had never really liked your parks at all before DMA (Which I loved), and I thought maybe I was becomming accustomed to your style. I guess not. One of the few good things I can say about this park is how it doesent remotely resemble any RCT1 park (which was stated by someone earlier). This is indeed taking the new game to unexplored levels, however it turns out I just wasnt quite ready for this level.


    When looking at this park, the amount of depth that I feel was put into it was minimal. Everything is so random. I know that is a common tradmark of your style, but I just cant stand it. On the other hand, my work is just as random (Probably tons more random), so I am really not in the right position to bitch on it. But really, I just felt no flow to this park. Nothing felt right, or really looked good for that matter. I found the architecture just sorta....... weak if you know what I mean. There was no "solidness" to it. No firm foundation to stand on can be found in this park (Just one of my strange little play-on-words, incase you guys are looking at me wierd). The coasters........ the coasters in many cases just lacked any sort of quality, and some were unbearably slow (*cough Jaguar cough*). To focus on some of the sections in particular, what exactly was with the Irish archy? I dont know, it just didnt look remotely like what I imagine it as. Same thing for the Venice and Oriental sections (although not to the greatest extent, the oriental architecture looked somewhat asian, but still not what I had in mind). One last complaint- the name........ ummm, well lets just say I wasnt to fond of the name. I dont like this name for a park for most of the same reasons that I dont like the name "Harakiriis Islands of Adventure". Just sort of cheesy and unrealistic.


    So, um, yeah, congrats on spotlight anyway! The one solitary thing I did like about this park however is that fort. I found the wall around it to be designed quite well, and the archy and scenary inside wasnt too bad either. Sorry I couldnt see anything special about the rest of the park though. My pickiness in parks has reached one of its all-time highs, so that could be a bennificial factor for my attitude towards Wormwood.
  • Tech Artist%s's Photo
    nice! i will put your park on my spotlighter page and you on my parkmaker page as a. rct and rct 2 master. awsome park Aero that park is defintley worthy of being a spotlight. :)
  • AustinPowers%s's Photo
    I was kind of surprised this was spotlight cuz I was expecting another park to win it....which I havent seen yet so I wont say this is better or worse...I dont know...but I will say...I agree with Beta and Butterfinger. For the first RCT2 park to win spotlight, it wasn't the best I have seen out there. It seems thrown together somewhat...nothing really stood out. I especially did not like the coasters. They seemed like an afterthought. This park isn't bad....it just didnt seem like spotlight material to me.
  • HeArTlInEtWiStEr%s's Photo
    Hey Iris, when will runner ups be released?

    HT
  • fatkat61%s's Photo

    Four leaf clover was a good ride

    it's four loop clover
  • Turtleman%s's Photo

    The coasters........ the coasters in many cases just lacked any sort of quality, and some were unbearably slow (*cough Jaguar cough*).


    You have to be joking... Jaguar is extremely fast through the inversions..

    Turtleman 8)
  • Blitz%s's Photo
    he meant towards the end... jaguar "lingers", and that's never a good thing...
    there were, however, plenty of good rides that made up for that.
  • aero21%s's Photo
    I would say Jaguar does have some "slow" moments, but it has the speed when it counts. There is only one inversion in the whole park that i believe is to slow and that is the zero G on Kung-Pow. I couldn't speed it up much, but i felt with the sceanery under it and a break run comming up it didn't need the speed. I also believe if you didn't see what you were looking for, that you were looking for the wrong thing. I didn't build this park on others thoughts, they were my own. Please don't compare my areas to what "you would have done" because it's your job to show what you think in your own park, not mine. That's what makes my style different from others. Thanks all for the coments and know that the next project is already started ;) .

    God Bless RCT2! Satan, you can have Wacky Worlds back!
  • Butterfinger%s's Photo

    You have to be joking... Jaguar is extremely fast through the inversions..



    Whoah, am I looking at the same coaster you are? The invert, Jaguar? I'm not just mixed up in my coaster names am I, becasue Jaguar was unbearably slow through the Immelman, Vertical Loop, and Cobra Roll (Thats all I really watched of it....... I sorta grow a bit impatient when looking at coasters). But seriously, the train was going 10-15 mph at the top of each of those inversions, at first I thought it wouldnt make it all the way through. Not that it really matters though, really. I am probably looking at the wrong coaster anyway.
  • Evil WME%s's Photo
    wow. at first at least. there were some great ideas, some great RCT2 archy. but then i noticed stuff like most of the buildings didnt have stalls. I noticed buildings that even had space for the stalls, but it seemed to be forgotten to actually place them there. YOU BIG LAZY BASTARTD. oh well.. and really, the peeps didn´t like the park! :@ ..

    on another note, the coasters and most areas were awesome, and there were a lot of nice details.. such as the magic carpet indoor and all.