Park / Audrix Towers

02-February 04

53 Comments

Foozycoaster Offline

I was very excited seeing X's areas, Especially the "african enterance". The craftsmanship here, and in the other sections was superb. Good job guys.
posted 21 years ago
- #41
- Back to top
Valp Offline

And everyone said, "It was good!"

And the third page was reached.

And the people desired a new spotlight.

And Iris answered the people's desires by....
posted 21 years ago
- #42
- Back to top
x-sector Offline

And Iris answered the people's desires by....
Not giving the NE public a new spootlight but made them wait for it, like good little children and instead he posted the runnners up first
posted 21 years ago
- #43
- Back to top
Corkscrewed Offline

But rest assured... the cries WERE heard....
posted 21 years ago
- #44
- Back to top
Dragon Slayer Offline

Audrix Towers The True Review

Me and my friend like to rate parks that we download on the phone and this is what we really thought about this so called spotlight.

Lets start with the entrance area. We really liked this area alot it had some really nice and creative ideas that people have not done before, the only thing we had to comment on was the cheata cage. If it were up to us we would of just stacked roman pillers and put single railed roller coaster on the top, that would make it look more like a cage, and just get rid of the whole dubble thing.

Moving on to the next area. The wooden coaster was so bad I coulnt stand to look at it. The senery around it was decent, but just the way the coaster look made us really think that he half assed it. Also putting the pathways going under the coaster was very stupid idea and it turned out looking like crap.

Moving on again to the town looking area. This area was somthing we have never seen before to bad it didnt look good. The river rapids were very well done but the dueling coaster was horible. NO ONE can do a racing coaster right, he should of just made it a single coaster that would of turned out better, and made it look less cludered. The senery was kinda cool but it is so repetive that its not even funny, and stacking the bathrooms I ask my self "WHY"

Now for the Aztec area, this was the worse of them all. This area was so bad theres no point in even talking about it enough said.

Now for the castle I liked this castle alot when I looked at it. But then I noticed some flaws. There were way too many windows and the poles sticking out of the castle was just a good idea gone wrong.

Another thing we happen to notice about this park is that you can tell that it is made by two different people"THIS IS NOT A GOOD THING"each area's that each person made have a diferent style which makes it look like two parks in one thus leeds to confusion.

Overall this park is not spotlight worthy and I think iris just gave it a spotlight becuase there has not been one in a long time. If you ask us we give this park a rating of 4 out of 10
posted 21 years ago
- #45
- Back to top
natelox Offline

Moving on to the next area. The wooden coaster was so bad I coulnt stand to look at it. The senery around it was decent, but just the way the coaster look made us really think that he half assed it. Also putting the pathways going under the coaster was very stupid idea and it turned out looking like crap.
Well, the rest of your post was your opinion, but I can hardly see how you thought his coaster was a "half-assed" job. It had a great, open layout with some nice double-ups/downs which you don't see very often in coasters today. And the path below, why do you think this is a bad idea? Most real roller coasters have service paths underneigth. It gives a more realistic feel.
posted 21 years ago
- #46
- Back to top
rctfreak2000 Offline

If you ask us we give this park a rating of 4 out of 10
Whew! Thank goodness we didn't...

For someone that can so easily put down something this good, I'd love to see you build something half as good as this.
posted 21 years ago
- #47
- Back to top
John Offline

Anybody else think the influx of... um... members lately has been fabricated?
I'm perplexed. It's just too fishy. (And no, I'm not talking about cBass.)
posted 21 years ago
- #48
- Back to top
Micool Offline

It's probably raven, who else would come up with a name like that.
posted 21 years ago
- #49
- Back to top
posix Offline

Yeah, it's definitely someone who has been at NE before.
Or just a bunch of sad idiots who think they have an idea of RCT.

Any mod done the ip check thing yet?
posted 21 years ago
- #50
- Back to top
JBruckner Offline

[font="tahoma"]Yeah, it's definitely someone who has been at NE before.
Or just a bunch of sad idiots who think they have an idea of RCT.

Any mod done the ip check thing yet?[/font]
[font="Arial"]
Wow.
And you say you have a life?
I cannot believe you are worried about a post about your park, thats fucking sad.
[/font]
posted 21 years ago
- #51
- Back to top
posix Offline

Are you kidding me?
posted 21 years ago
- #52
- Back to top
Dragon Slayer Offline

my review had nothing against you posix i love most of ur parks but this one i find not to my liking
posted 21 years ago
- #53
- Back to top
posix Offline

my review had nothing against you posix i love most of ur parks but this one i find not to my liking
Uh, I meant Glitchwolf.
And it's not like I don't agree with you about my areas in this park.
posted 21 years ago
- #54
- Back to top