Park / Kong: The Waterfall Escape

Park_1172 Kong: The Waterfall Escape

1,433 Comments

This park shares comments with 67 other parks(View Parks)
  • Ride6%s's Photo
    Oh that is nice to hear John, because it's true, although you'll probably kick my ass. Your archetecture is SOoooOOooo much more developed than mine.

    Well i'm filling a 50 by 50 map for the hotel but i'm uncluding a couple rides and such supporting it. Would that be allowed??? I mean the hotel WILL COVER AT LEAST 1/4 of the map, and the map is new for the hotel. There is just a coaster a some flats attached as a "resort". Is this okay? or must i kill the rides?
  • Aviator%s's Photo
    Damnit... how can I win a contest that involves building rides... I suck with that stuf!... oh well.

    I must have missed somethin because I didnt pic up on anything about if we are going to have blanks for the contests or if its just suppose to be a specific size.
  • Evil WME%s's Photo
    i just know i´m gonna see all kinds of evil wme rides. the ferocious tiger... *dreams on
  • mantis%s's Photo

    Damnit... how can I win a contest that involves building rides... I suck with that stuf!... oh well.

    I must have missed somethin because I didnt pic up on anything about if we are going to have blanks for the contests or if its just suppose to be a specific size.

    Erm...Iris posted, and it's since been quoted several times:

    YOU CAN USE ANY WORKBENCH YOU WANT


    And ride6 - it's not uncommon to have rides at hotels (at least in RCT anyway) so I assume that's ok. As long as it's an integral part of the hotel, I guess.

    But i'm not the one running it.


    I think the easiest person to theme a coaster to would be Fatha', cos he's from a film etc, but i'm looking forward to seeing some really creative entries.
  • airtimeuk%s's Photo
    I know which ones i will be entering, one question can WW be used?
  • jon%s's Photo
    are we allowed to show pics of our entries to tease the enemy!
  • deanosrs%s's Photo
    Why bother. It's only a week per comp. And it's not as if we're all going to shit ourselves at the site of your screens, Jon.
  • jon%s's Photo
    no we'll shit ourselves at the site of your mum!
  • deanosrs%s's Photo
    That doesn't even dignify a response. I will not sink to your level.
  • Doc%s's Photo
    Good idea - but automatically allowing parkmakers to enter is yet another reason why NEW parkmakers cannot and will not be recognised. The hierarchy of parkmakers serves NO useful purposes and I believe it is all becoming too competitive. Where's the fun gone?
  • John%s's Photo
    With $100 as the prize, I would hope Raven and iris want alot of talent, to be able to milk the contest for all it's worth, etc. It wouldn't be as appealing without the NE/non-NE parkmaker mix. If they have earned a parkmaker slot, why should they have to prove themselves again when it's already been done? Gets a little redundant, especially when we KNOW who would win. ;) Plus, this way non-NE parkmakers actually have a SHOT at getting involved and playing against the best. If we had parkmakers doing the weeklies, there'd be a majority of parkmakers competing.

    IMO, a non-NE parkmaker will get MORE recognition for doing well in this if they place high in the actual competition against parkmakers, on top of having to "prove" themselves to iris...
  • Metropole%s's Photo

    With $100 as the prize, I would hope Raven and iris want alot of talent, to be able to milk the contest for all it's worth, etc. It wouldn't be as appealing without the NE/non-NE parkmaker mix. If they have earned a parkmaker slot, why should they have to prove themselves again when it's already been done? Gets a little redundant, especially when we KNOW who would win. ;) Plus, this way non-NE parkmakers actually have a SHOT at getting involved and playing against the best. If we had parkmakers doing the weeklies, there'd be a majority of parkmakers competing.

    IMO, a non-NE parkmaker will get MORE recognition for doing well in this if they place high in the actual competition against parkmakers, on top of having to "prove" themselves to iris...

    I must say, that John, you are damn right!

    Metro B)
  • Dixi%s's Photo
    OMFG :0

    Anybody planning to enter the rapids competition, give up now.
    Beware.

    Oh and BTW, I asked Iris about posting pics, he said you cant for the qualifying section, but he's not sure about the actual main part yet.
  • mantis%s's Photo

    Good idea - but automatically allowing parkmakers to enter is yet another reason why NEW parkmakers cannot and will not be recognised. The hierarchy of parkmakers serves NO useful purposes and I believe it is all becoming too competitive. Where's the fun gone?

    As John so rightly said - if you had Parkmakers entering these qualifiers, the final competition would be...12 parkmakers fighting between themselves. That'd be real fun.

    Aside from this competition, I can't really think of any time when parkmakers have had a great advantage over everyone else aside from the possible 'fame'. And I think a lot of the time parkmakers get less constructive criticism than non-parkmakers do.

    And this isn't a democracy, it's a dictatorship :D
  • Doc%s's Photo

    And this isn't a democracy, it's a dictatorship :D

    No kidding...
  • Evil WME%s's Photo
    yes, iris is our dicktator!
  • Brent%s's Photo
    I might have missed this, but who exactly's doing the judging?
  • rctfreak2000%s's Photo

    OMFG  :0

    Anybody planning to enter the rapids competition, give up now.
    Beware.

    Oh and BTW, I asked Iris about posting pics, he said you cant for the qualifying section, but he's not sure about the actual main part yet.

    Nah, I'll just finish mine.

    Stop being arrogant. *slaps Voodoo*
  • mantis%s's Photo
    People shouldn't confuse arrogance with confidence. It's crushing, otherwise.
  • rctfreak2000%s's Photo

    People shouldn't confuse arrogance with confidence. It's crushing, otherwise.

    Stop telling me I'm wrong. *slaps mantis*