overratedrct

• Offline
• United States

Lagom + Fisch

 

I feel like none of Lagom's individual park aspects beyond possibly atmosphere are at spotlight-level. His architecture beyond for a few flashy setpieces isn't all that great, and his layouts aren't anything to write home about either, but the biggest thing that both Lagom and Fisch do that makes them look a lot better than what they are is essentially making full-size h2h parks. People on NE masturbate to little details too much and inflate a parks virtuosity or rating based off of that. It relies less on pure parkmaking skill (that Pacificoaster or Nin or Robbie92 show) and more on little setpiece gimmicks to patch up the holes and lets discerning viewers overlook flaws.

 

I don't think either Grona Lund or Riverland should have got over an 85, and while I still think they're both spotlight-worthy, they both have gaping-hole sized flaws and shortcomings in the parkmaking that went behind them.